Customization, complexity, and a lack of consistency
To move your business forward, sometimes you have to pause and take the time to honestly assess where you are today—and where you want to go. That was the reality facing our client, a global financial services company, as it struggled to improve the performance of its essential ServiceNow platform. The system was used by thousands of employees daily to request services, resolve issues, and manage their information technology (IT) and human resources (HR) needs. But years of customization across decentralized business units had steadily diluted the platform’s full potential. What began as a leading-edge tool for delivering employee services had devolved over several years into a patchwork of inconsistent user experiences, unit-specific workflows, and daily friction for administrators and employees alike.
The tipping point came with a large-scale acquisition that expanded the company’s products—and added still another highly customized ServiceNow instance into the mix. For the chief information officer (CIO) and team, maintaining the status quo was no longer viable. Platform complexity was dragging down performance and making it harder to deliver employee services at scale amid several entrenched and increasingly daunting challenges. These included:
- Inconsistent user experiences: Depending on their business unit or location, staff encountered vastly different support experiences for the same types of requests—a frustration for both employees and the IT and HR service leads overseeing the services.
- Mounting technical debt: Years of ad hoc development and staff turnover left critical logic undocumented, forcing teams to invest valuable time deciphering and triaging legacy code instead of delivering new value.
- Fragmented data and workflows: Without a common model or governance structure, many IT and HR services operated in isolation, with disconnected data, inconsistent processes, and custom code.
- Innovation barriers: The heavy customization and multiple instances made it difficult to easily deploy ServiceNow’s regular release enhancements—including automation and artificial intelligence capabilities—and connect the platform to other enterprise systems.
- Growing risk and cost: Maintaining multiple, incompatible instances was expensive and increasingly risky as the platform strayed further from baseline standards.
- Dwindling productivity: Perhaps most important, the system was slowing everyone down. Employees spent more time chasing answers and waiting on resolutions, while IT and HR administrators were managing multiple versions of the same functions—adding effort, not value.
The company faced a fundamental decision: Replace the entire system? Or reset the platform, reimagine the architecture, and build forward from a strong, standardized baseline?