An optimal procurement framework gives a luxury brand the tools it needs to walk the razor’s edge between a host of competing demands – like exclusivity and availability. Or between using customer data to deliver exceptional customer experiences and keeping that data secure.
One luxury retailer saw signs that its indirect procurement capabilities were becoming unacceptably dated, making it challenging to keep pace with modern demands. Knowing it needed a clear-eyed assessment from someone well-versed in the complexities and nuances of procurement, as well as the unique challenges of luxury retail, the company turned to KPMG.
Modernized IT procurement is a must-have for comprehensive transformation
After KPMG developed a wide-ranging and in-depth understanding of the retailer’s indirect procurement capabilities, it was clear that procurement transformation would require technology upgrades. Ironically, as is the case with many companies, this retailer was thwarted from purchasing new IT due to an inefficient IT purchasing end-to-end process with disparate systems that had not been integrated.
The retailer embarked on a multi-phased transformation project with the initial phase being the development of a Minimum Viable Product (MVP). This MVP would quickly address IT purchasing challenges and enable the scalability to power an all-encompassing procurement transformation.
Defining an IT procurement makeover
A successful IT procurement transformation would need to address the multiple challenges this luxury retailer was facing:
- Inconsistent workflows: Different departments followed different procurement processes leading to a lack of standardization and increased complexity.
- Manual processes: Workflows were manual and often email-based, requiring “swivel chairing,” or entering the same information into multiple systems, decreasing efficiency, and increasing the margin of error.
- Limited visibility: A lack of transparency into procurement workflows made it difficult to track requests and identify the source of delays.
- Compliance concerns: A lack of standardized processes heightened the risks of running afoul of data protection and other regulatory requirements and failing to comply with internal policies designed to mitigate legal and financial risks.
- Tracking and managing SLAs: Difficulties in the effective tracking and management of service level agreements (SLAs) caused inconsistent recording, delays, and miscommunications, leading to operational disruptions and difficulties in ensuring vendor compliance.
- User frustrations: Employees found procurement processes difficult to navigate and experienced difficulties in securing the hardware, software, and IT staffing solutions they needed.
The impact of these challenges on employees increased the probability that they would bypass procurement process and policy altogether. The consequences can include engaging with unauthorized suppliers, overpaying for goods and services, or worse.
Cesar Suarez, a KPMG Director in the Procurement & Supply Chain practice, warns, "If you engage with a company on a blacklist, cut a deal with them, and sign a contract, you might not only be incurring ‘maverick’ spend but also potentially putting your organization at risk." Cesar emphasizes, "Any organization that has not implemented a modern Spend Intake & Orchestration solution may not be able to accurately manage spend to generate savings and have significantly elongated purchasing processes that frustrate your end users.”
Adam Pflantzer, a KPMG Digital Transformation Manager, recognized how these challenges impacted the top-down view. "The company felt like the procurement process they had in place didn't allow leadership to see where the bottlenecks were. They needed metrics to understand exactly which groups were at fault, at which times, or if it was the vendor they were waiting on."