Mobility Matters
War in the Middle East: Selected U.S. Tax Implications of Crisis‑Driven Relocations
March 2026 | By Sam Rusher, Yoori Sohn, Carly Rhodes, and John Seery, KPMG LLP (U.S.)
Geopolitical events can quickly disrupt global mobility programs, forcing organizations to make urgent relocation decisions that may carry significant U.S. tax and compliance implications. As conditions related to the current conflict continue to evolve, employers with globally mobile workforces may face a range of downstream implications after immediate safety and evacuation decisions have been made.
Key U.S. tax implications may arise when employees are evacuated, repatriated, or reassigned to new locations. These include circumstances in which certain employer‑paid evacuation and relief expenses may qualify for tax‑free treatment under section 139, the effect of interrupted foreign assignments on foreign earned income exclusion eligibility, and broader workforce relocation risks that can emerge as work locations shift across jurisdictions.
As organizations assess next steps, additional factors such as withholding and reporting obligations, permanent establishment exposure, and social security considerations may also come into focus. Awareness of these potential implications can help employers anticipate mobility‑related tax challenges and support informed decision‑making during periods of heightened uncertainty.
Read more to understand key U.S. tax implications associated with crisis‑driven relocations.
Dive into our thinking:
Mobility Matters
War in the Middle East: Selected U.S. Tax Implications of Crisis‑Driven Relocations
Download PDFGMS Flash Alerts and Mobility Matters
Meet our team