BSA/AML/CFT Compliance
Enforcement trends and rulemaking highlight regulators’ focus on financial crimes program design and effectiveness
KPMG Regulatory Insights
- Long Standing Issues: Documenting concerns or engaging in prolonged internal reviews without appropriate corrective action does not satisfy a financial institution’s compliance obligations. Financial institutions that fail to timely remediate known issues risk being identified as “willfully” violating BSA/AML/CFT program compliance.
- Risk-Based Supervision: Enforcement actions align with regulators’ priorities to tailor supervision to an individual financial institution’s size, complexity, business model, and risk profile as well as the administration’s priorities of national security and foreign policy.
- Next Steps: Remediation efforts may require engaging with an independent third party to evaluate BSA/AML compliance program design and effectiveness, conduct root-cause analyses, and identify areas for improvement. In certain cases, third parties may perform a historical look back to determine whether suspicious activity was appropriately identified, investigated, and reported.
- Looking Forward: As the volume and complexity of transactions continue to increase, financial institutions should align risk assessments, staffing, escalation processes, and remediation oversight across business lines to integrate compliance throughout the institution. Regulators increasingly expect BSA/AML and sanctions compliance programs to be “effectively integrated and mutually reinforcing” on an enterprise-wide basis.
Regulators* are focusing heightened attention and enforcement across financial institutions subject to the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA). The actions are consistent with the administration’s priorities of national security and foreign policy as well as proposals to “modernize” BSA compliance through changes to anti-money laundering/countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) programs that would focus supervisory attention on “higher-risk” entities and activities and the “effectiveness” of their AML/CFT programs (see KPMG Regulatory Alert here).
BSA/AML Risk Management and Compliance
Recent enforcement actions highlight deficiencies in various financial institutions’ BSA/AML compliance programs and related sanctions compliance. Findings include failure to:
Topic | Examples |
BSA/AML Compliance Program |
|
Controls |
|
Due Diligence |
|
Suspicious Activity |
|
Sanctions |
|
Independent Testing |
|
Resources |
|
Potential Remedial Actions
Examples of remedial actions cited in recent regulatory enforcement orders include:
Topic | Action |
Board Oversight and Governance
| Require boards to enhance oversight of BSA/AML remediation efforts, including efforts to:
|
Risk Assessment Programs
|
|
Customer Due Diligence
|
|
Suspicious Activity Monitoring and Reporting |
|
Sanctions Compliance |
|
Independent Testing and Internal Audit |
|
Independent Consultant and Lookback Reviews
| Retain qualified independent third parties to:
|
Staffing and Training |
|
Employee Accountability |
|
Progress Reporting and Regulatory Communication |
|
Dive into our thinking:
BSA/AML/CFT Compliance
Enforcement trends and rulemaking highlight regulators’ focus on financial crimes program design and effectiveness
Download PDFExplore more
Get the latest from KPMG Regulatory Insights
KPMG Regulatory Insights is the thought leader hub for timely insight on risk and regulatory developments.
Meet our team