Skip to main content

BSA/AML/CFT Compliance

Enforcement trends and rulemaking highlight regulators’ focus on financial crimes program design and effectiveness

U.S. Capitol Dome Washintgon DC


KPMG Regulatory Insights

  • Long Standing Issues: Documenting concerns or engaging in prolonged internal reviews without appropriate corrective action does not satisfy a financial institution’s compliance obligations. Financial institutions that fail to timely remediate known issues risk being identified as “willfully” violating BSA/AML/CFT program compliance.
  • Risk-Based Supervision: Enforcement actions align with regulators’ priorities to tailor supervision to an individual financial institution’s size, complexity, business model, and risk profile as well as the administration’s priorities of national security and foreign policy.  
  • Next Steps: Remediation efforts may require engaging with an independent third party to evaluate BSA/AML compliance program design and effectiveness, conduct root-cause analyses, and identify areas for improvement. In certain cases, third parties may perform a historical look back to determine whether suspicious activity was appropriately identified, investigated, and reported.
  • Looking Forward: As the volume and complexity of transactions continue to increase, financial institutions should align risk assessments, staffing, escalation processes, and remediation oversight across business lines to integrate compliance throughout the institution. Regulators increasingly expect BSA/AML and sanctions compliance programs to be “effectively integrated and mutually reinforcing” on an enterprise-wide basis. 
October 2026
*Note: Agencies taking enforcement actions include the Department of the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) and Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), Federal Reserve Board (FRB), Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), and Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA).

 

Regulators* are focusing heightened attention and enforcement across financial institutions subject to the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA). The actions are consistent with the administration’s priorities of national security and foreign policy as well as proposals to “modernize” BSA compliance through changes to anti-money laundering/countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) programs that would focus supervisory attention on “higher-risk” entities and activities and the “effectiveness” of their AML/CFT programs (see KPMG Regulatory Alert here).

BSA/AML Risk Management and Compliance

Recent enforcement actions highlight deficiencies in various financial institutions’ BSA/AML compliance programs and related sanctions compliance. Findings include failure to:

Topic

Examples

BSA/AML Compliance Program

  • Establish, implement and maintain a BSA/AML compliance program designed to comply with the BSA and its implementing regulations.
  • Conduct effective risk assessments, tailored to the financial institution’s business activities.

Controls

  • Design, implement, and maintain a system of internal controls.
  • Identify and timely address significant/systemic internal control gaps, including weaknesses in transaction monitoring, fraud referral processes, third-party risk assessment, and financial crimes risk management.
  • Establish effective transaction monitoring controls, including the configuration and supervision of surveillance tools and data governance practices or to timely correct known deficiencies.  

Due Diligence

  • Establish and maintain an effective framework to conduct ongoing customer due diligence and customer identification program procedures, including to update customer information on a risk basis (e.g., sanctions evasion risks).
  • Conduct due diligence for correspondent accounts for foreign financial institutions.

Suspicious Activity

  • Identify, evaluate, and report suspicious activity on a timely basis (e.g., missed, late, inaccurate, and incomplete suspicious activity reports (SARs)).
  • Monitor large volumes of transactions, including those of “high-risk” customers.

Sanctions

  • Mitigate and report priority national security risks related to money laundering and illicit finance.
  • Update watchlists following OFAC designations.

Independent Testing

  • Establish effective independent testing (e.g., internal audit) to monitor the financial institution’s compliance with BSA/AML regulatory requirements.

Resources

  • Adequately staff and provide appropriate risk-based BSA/AML training, commensurate with an employee’s job-specific responsibilities and duties.

Potential Remedial Actions

Examples of remedial actions cited in recent regulatory enforcement orders include:

Topic

Action

Board Oversight and Governance

 

Require boards to enhance oversight of BSA/AML remediation efforts, including efforts to:

  • Hold management accountable for executing effective remediation plans, including to implement and maintain effective BSA/AML compliance programs.
  • Ensure adequate staffing and resources.
  • Receive timely reporting regarding compliance risks, deficiencies, and remediation progress.

Risk Assessment Programs

 

  • Submit a written plan to improve BSA/AML compliance programs, which include written policies, standards, and procedures.
  • Develop or enhance institution-wide BSA/AML risk assessment processes that evaluate products, services, customer types, transactions activity, geographies, delivery channels, and other financial crime risks.
  • Risk assessment frameworks should be periodically refreshed and supported by effective management reporting and governance.

Customer Due Diligence

 

  • Implement risk-based customer due diligence and customer identification programs designed to appropriately understand the nature and purpose of customer relationships, assign (and revise) risk ratings, conduct ongoing monitoring, collect required information, and escalate higher-risk customer activity.

Suspicious Activity Monitoring and Reporting

  • Develop, implement, and adhere to a risk-based suspicious activity identification, evaluation, and reporting program.
  • Enhance suspicious activity monitoring systems, thresholds, models, escalation processes, and SAR investigation procedures to ensure suspicious activity is identified, investigated, and reported accurately and timely across business lines.

Sanctions Compliance

  • Develop and maintain a documented methodology for assessing OFAC risks, provide ongoing, periodic training tailored to an employee's job responsibilities, and enhance sanctions policies and procedures, including OFAC screening procedures.

Independent Testing and Internal Audit

  • Conduct independent testing and audit programs to evaluate the adequacy of BSA/AML policies, procedures, internal controls, monitoring systems, training, and suspicious activity reporting processes.

Independent Consultant and Lookback Reviews

 

Retain qualified independent third parties to:

  • Evaluate BSA/AML transaction monitoring programs.
  • Conduct root-cause analyses.
  • Assess corrective actions, recommend control enhancements and/or program redesign.
  • Perform data testing, including data lineage, data quality, mapping and governance controls.
  • Conduct historical lookback reviews to determine whether suspicious activity should have been identified, investigated, or reported. 

Staffing and Training

  • Conduct staffing assessments and provide sufficient personnel, expertise, training, and resources to support BSA/AML compliance obligations. Training programs should be tailored to employees' specific responsibilities and financial crime risks.

Employee Accountability

  • Establish processes to identify, investigate, and address employee misconduct contributing to BSA/AML compliance failures and implement appropriate governance surrounding disciplinary actions and accountability measures.

Progress Reporting and Regulatory Communication

  • Provide periodic progress reports to regulators detailing remediation activities, implementation milestones, corrective actions, and compliance status.

Dive into our thinking:

BSA/AML/CFT Compliance

Enforcement trends and rulemaking highlight regulators’ focus on financial crimes program design and effectiveness

Download PDF

Get the latest from KPMG Regulatory Insights

KPMG Regulatory Insights is the thought leader hub for timely insight on risk and regulatory developments.

Thank you

Thank you for signing up to receive Regulatory Insights thought leadership content. You will receive our next issue when we publish.

Get the latest from KPMG Regulatory Insights

KPMG Regulatory Insights is the thought leader hub for timely insight on risk and regulatory developments. Get the latest perspectives on evolving supervisory, regulatory, and enforcement trends. 

To receive ongoing KPMG Regulatory Insights, please submit your information below:
(*required field)
All fields with an asterisk (*) are required.
Please check at least one checkbox.

By submitting, you agree that KPMG LLP may process any personal information you provide pursuant to KPMG LLP's . Privacy Statement

An error occurred.

Thank you!

Thank you for contacting KPMG. We will respond to you as soon as possible.

Contact KPMG

Use this form to submit general inquiries to KPMG. We will respond to you as soon as possible.
All fields with an asterisk (*) are required.

Job seekers

Visit our careers section or search our jobs database.

Submit RFP

Use the RFP submission form to detail the services KPMG can help assist you with.

Office locations

International hotline

You can confidentially report concerns to the KPMG International hotline

Press contacts

Do you need to speak with our Press Office? Here's how to get in touch.

Headline