Industries

Helping clients meet their business challenges begins with an in-depth understanding of the industries in which they work. That’s why KPMG LLP established its industry-driven structure. In fact, KPMG LLP was the first of the Big Four firms to organize itself along the same industry lines as clients.

How We Work

We bring together passionate problem-solvers, innovative technologies, and full-service capabilities to create opportunity with every insight.

Learn more

Careers & Culture

What is culture? Culture is how we do things around here. It is the combination of a predominant mindset, actions (both big and small) that we all commit to every day, and the underlying processes, programs and systems supporting how work gets done.

Learn more

Italy: Beneficial ownership of dividend income based on parent-subsidiary directive (Supreme Court decision)

A Supreme Court decision on beneficial ownership in the context of divided payments. 

Share
November 20, 2024

The Italian Supreme Court of Cassation in early September 2024 issued Decision No. 23628 on beneficial ownership in the context of divided payments.

Overview

A Dutch company, receiving dividends from its Italian subsidiary between 2013 and 2016, requested a tax refund based on the parent-subsidiary directive in 2017. The request was denied, leading to an appeal to the Supreme Court.

Referring to a prior CJEU decision, the Supreme Court held that meeting a beneficial ownership requirement represents a critical element for the proper application of the parent-subsidiary directive.

The Supreme Court clarified that beneficial ownership requires meeting three autonomous tests:

  • The substantive business activity test: Focused on whether the entity receiving the dividends conducts genuine economic activity
  • The control test: Focused on whether the recipient can freely dispose of the income or is required to pass it to a third party
  • The business purpose test: Evaluated whether the entity’s involvement in cross-border dividends serves a legitimate business purpose or exploits favorable tax treatment

The Supreme Court noted that the parent company was engaged in real business activity and had an operational presence in the Netherlands, that it retained a significant part of the dividends received, and that it had been set up in the Netherlands even before the adoption of the parent-subsidiary directive.

Based on the above, the Supreme Court upheld the taxpayer’s appeal and referred back to the Court of Second instance for a final ruling on the facts, in light of the guidelines provided by the Supreme Court. 

Read a November 2024 report prepared by KPMG's EU Tax Centre

Thank you!

Thank you for contacting KPMG. We will respond to you as soon as possible.

Contact KPMG

Use this form to submit general inquiries to KPMG. We will respond to you as soon as possible.

By submitting, you agree that KPMG LLP may process any personal information you provide pursuant to KPMG LLP's Privacy Statement.

An error occurred. Please contact customer support.

Job seekers

Visit our careers section or search our jobs database.

Submit RFP

Use the RFP submission form to detail the services KPMG can help assist you with.

Office locations

International hotline

You can confidentially report concerns to the KPMG International hotline

Press contacts

Do you need to speak with our Press Office? Here's how to get in touch.

Headline