Considerations for asset management companies
The volatile market conditions are squeezing earning margins and putting pressure on asset management firms' profitability.
Asset managers are facing an increasingly competitive global marketplace, evolving regulatory and tax landscape, and changing investor trends.
With economic uncertainty expected to continue throughout 2023, asset managers are weighing their options. Rising costs, rising interest rates and widening credit spreads are prompting asset managers to evaluate whether they can adjust the price of their debt to market interest rates. In an environment where private credit and other asset classes are attractive, asset managers are contemplating launching new products or product rationalization to drive profit.
Those moves are options, but there are variables they need to consider such as –
“With rising interest rates and increased cost of services, as well as the changes to the economic environment, asset managers continue to look for ways to reduce operating costs, potential product rationalization and opportunities to launch innovative products that will increase revenue. Asset managers should factor in both regulatory and accounting implications when considering these opportunities,” said Matt Giordano, Deputy Lead Partner, Public Investment Management.
Regardless of the industry, preparers should ask:
Inflation affects the cost of doing business and companies may not be able to increase prices to customers enough to offset rising inflation, putting pressure on forecasted profit margins. Margins are often key inputs into companies’ long-lived asset and goodwill impairment testing.
The fair value estimates inherent in goodwill and other asset impairment analyses can be sensitive to discount rates, so a rising interest rate environment can have very significant impacts to some companies.
Monitoring for triggering events is a continuous assessment. So even if an annual impairment test has already been performed, another may be necessary as conditions evolve.
In response to economic uncertainty, companies may also modify revenue and debt contracts to reduce minimum quantity commitments, adjust delivery schedules for certain goods or services, change the price of those goods or services, or extend payment terms. These modifications may require companies to assess that change under the specific contract modification guidance for how they recognize revenue.
Furthermore, companies may be adjusting share-based payment arrangements to better align with the current macroeconomic environment to motivate employee behavior toward company goals. For example, an original sales target may no longer be attainable due to economic headwinds, and a company may lower that threshold under the compensation arrangement to make it more likely that its employees can vest in the awards. These modifications can have significant accounting and reporting consequences and should be evaluated carefully, ideally before any changes are implemented.
Preparers should be mindful that this year-end reporting season is not ‘business as usual’. Challenges posed by the current economic environment may require additional attention and judgment.
Asset Management: Economic uncertainty and financial reporting
Download PDFHealthcare & Life Sciences
KPMG U.S.' Marc Scher and Mark Drozdowski provide considerations for healthcare and life sciences companies.
Higher Education & Not-for-Profits
KPMG U.S.' David Gagnon provides considerations for the HENFP sector.
Renewables
KPMG U.S.' Todd Fowler provides considerations for renewables companies.
Technology, Media & Telecom
KPMG U.S.' Janel Riley and Frank Albarella Jr. provide considerations for tech, media & telecom (TMT) companies.