Complexity abounds in financial instruments accounting
Continued complexity surrounds the issue of how to classify financial instruments like warrants. Should they be treated as debt or equity? Panelists discussed this issue in the context of financial instruments settled in a company’s own shares. In particular, it was noted that form matters, meaning that an instrument’s features require careful analysis. Read chapter 6 of our Handbook, Debt and equity financing.
Another issue panelists encounter frequently is whether a debt restructuring is a modification or extinguishment. Panelists discussed a recent EITF recommendation on this topic and the FASB’s recent tentative decision to simplify a portion of this guidance. See the FASB project page.
Implementing the segment reporting standard
Panelists identified some issues and trends they have encountered as companies move toward adopting ASU 2023-07. They touched on the difficulty companies are having identifying which segment expenses to disclose, and agreed that companies are still weighing the risks and benefits of disclosing additional measures of profit or loss since those measures must comply with the SEC’s non-GAAP measures rules.
The discussion echoed some of the themes discussed by preparers on Day 1, Preparers’ perspectives on emerging issues. Read more about implementing the standard in our Handbook and about the SEC Staff’s latest clarifications in our recent Hot Topic.
Revenue recognition is always an important topic
No panel on accounting issues would be complete without a discussion of revenue recognition. Customer incentives and contract modifications were called out. Read more in section 5.7 and chapter 11 of our Handbook, Revenue recognition.
The cash flow statement continues to be a mine field
Cash flow statement issues have been the third most common area of restatements in the past 20 years. To mitigate the potential for restating cash flow statements, panelists urged companies to:
Read more in our Handbook, Statement of cash flows.