Industries

Helping clients meet their business challenges begins with an in-depth understanding of the industries in which they work. That’s why KPMG LLP established its industry-driven structure. In fact, KPMG LLP was the first of the Big Four firms to organize itself along the same industry lines as clients.

How We Work

We bring together passionate problem-solvers, innovative technologies, and full-service capabilities to create opportunity with every insight.

Learn more

Careers & Culture

What is culture? Culture is how we do things around here. It is the combination of a predominant mindset, actions (both big and small) that we all commit to every day, and the underlying processes, programs and systems supporting how work gets done.

Learn more

All voices matter

The FASB repeatedly emphasized the role of stakeholders in recently completed and upcoming projects.

Share

During a presentation at the 2024 AICPA & CIMA Conference on Current SEC and PCAOB Developments, FASB Chair Richard Jones and members of his technical staff put the FASB’s recent standard-setting activities into context. Their overarching theme was how stakeholder feedback has influenced the FASB’s agenda and many of the specific projects.  

Stakeholder feedback started with the 2021 Invitation to Comment, which has largely driven the FASB’s technical agenda over the past few years. At the project level, stakeholder feedback has led the FASB to modify a number of its tentative decisions, as illustrated in much of the discussion below. 

It sounds obvious, but preparers really do need a project plan. With lots of standard-setting activity at the FASB, companies may have to adopt multiple standards in a one- or two-year period. A detailed plan will enable proper implementation without the chaos. And submit comments on exposure drafts – the FASB needs all of our input to help achieve robust standards. 

Kimber Bascom

KPMG Deputy Chief Accountant

DISE – a standard 20 years in the making

Jones explained why he views the new standard on disaggregation of income statement expenses (DISE)  as so critical to investors. Historically, required disclosures have given a clear picture of the items on each line of the balance sheet, but such detail has been lacking regarding items on each line of the income statement, particularly with line items such as cost of sales and SG&A.

Read more about DISE and the other disaggregation projects below.

Projects to modernize or fill a void

Other projects that are well advanced seek to make existing standards more operable or more in line with the economics of transactions (software costs), fill a void in current US GAAP while also reducing diversity in practice (environmental credit programs and government grants) or ‘modernize’ the Codification (interim reporting). Read more about these projects below.

>> DISE – and the other disaggregation projects

DISE is one of three large disaggregation projects FASB prioritized in response to investor calls for more detailed expense information to help evaluate an entity’s cash flows. These three ASUs have staggered effective dates, as follows.

ASU 2024-03, Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses, is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2026, but the implementation lift is considerable because the standard may require changes in how expense data is collected and categorized by systems and financial reporting teams. Read more about implementing the standard here

Companies will begin applying ASU 2023-09, Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures, next filing season, with the standard being effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2024. Read more about implementing the standard here.

Companies disclosing segment information will begin complying with ASU 2023-07, Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures, this filing season, with the standard being effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2023. Read more about implementing the standard in our handbook and about the SEC Staff’s latest clarifications in our recent Hot Topic.  

    >> Select projects that modernize or fill a void

    In October 2024, the FASB issued an exposure draft to make the accounting for internal-use software development costs more compatible with the agile nature of software development methods. It would eliminate the concept of project development stages and limit cost capitalization to when (1) management has authorized and committed to funding a project and (2) it is probable the product will be completed and the software will be used to perform its intended function. Comments are due by January 27, 2025.

    Read about the proposal here.

    In November 2024, the FASB issued an exposure draft to provide guidance on how business entities should recognize, measure and present government grants received. The proposal is modeled on the accounting under IAS 20 (government grants and government assistance), with targeted revisions to areas such as scope. Comments are due by March 31, 2025.

    Read about the proposal here

    The FASB expects to issue an exposure draft on environmental credit programs before the end of this year. Credits within scope would be recognized as an asset (at cost) when it is probable that it will be used to settle an environmental credit obligation, sold or traded; a liability would be recognized for environmental credit obligations, generally arising from compliance programs. Costs to obtain other credits would be expensed when incurred. 

    Read about the project here.

    In November 2024, the FASB issued an exposure draft to modernize the interim reporting requirements. Notably, the Board has compiled an extensive list of disclosures across the Codification that apply to interim reporting periods. The Board’s approach was to determine whether prior Boards that adopted each disclosure requirement intended that the requirement apply to interim periods. 

    Read about the proposal here

    If history is a good guide, the anticipated Agenda Consultation will be an excellent opportunity for stakeholders to voice their opinions about potential FASB projects. When providing input to the FASB, consider the FASB's principle objective of achievable standard-setting that focuses on both the needs of investors and operability for preparers.

    Megan Hearn

    KPMG Partner, Department of Professional Practice

    Lastly, please respond...

    The FASB emphasized three upcoming projects – with a call to all stakeholders to make their views known and play a role in the process.

    • Financial KPIs (currently the subject of an Invitation to Comment): What role should FASB play when these KPIs are not currently part of financial statements?

    • Intangibles (Invitation to Comment about to be issued): Should there be one accounting model?

    • Statement of cash flows: What additional decision-useful information could be provided in the statement of cash flows?   

    Accounting Research Online

    Access our accounting research website for additional resources for your financial reporting needs.

    Thank you!

    Thank you for contacting KPMG. We will respond to you as soon as possible.

    Contact KPMG

    Use this form to submit general inquiries to KPMG. We will respond to you as soon as possible.

    By submitting, you agree that KPMG LLP may process any personal information you provide pursuant to KPMG LLP's Privacy Statement.

    An error occurred. Please contact customer support.

    Job seekers

    Visit our careers section or search our jobs database.

    Submit RFP

    Use the RFP submission form to detail the services KPMG can help assist you with.

    Office locations

    International hotline

    You can confidentially report concerns to the KPMG International hotline

    Press contacts

    Do you need to speak with our Press Office? Here's how to get in touch.

    Headline