Resolution analysis, submissions, and filings
KPMG Insights:
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
June 2024
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) issues a final rule to require the submission of resolution plans by insured depository institutions (IDIs) with $100 billion or more in total assets and information filings by IDIs with at least $50 billion but less than $100 billion in total assets. The requirements facilitate the FDIC’s use of its authority under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (FDI Act) to resolve an IDI in the event of insolvency.
In final form, the rule retains most key features from the proposal (see KPMG Regulatory Alert, here) including:
Key changes from the proposed rule include:
The final rule will take effect on October 1, 2024. All IDIs will receive a written notice specifying when their initial submissions are due. IDIs with $100 billion or more in total assets should anticipate a submission date that is at least 270 days from the effective date of the final rule. IDIs with at least $50 billion but less than $100 billion in total assets should anticipate a submission date that is at least one year from the effective date of the final rule.
The final rule amends the FDIC’s existing rule governing resolution plans for IDIs with $50 billion or more in total assets with regard to the content and timing of resolution submissions and related interim supplements to those submissions as well as how the credibility of resolution submissions will be assessed. The resolution submissions are intended to support the FDIC’s readiness in the event of material distress and failure of a large IDI.
Application and Submissions. The final rule applies to all IDIs with $50 billion or more in total assets (hereinafter, “covered IDIs” or “CIDIs”) and classifies them as follows:
The asset size of CIDIs would be determined based on the average of the institution’s four most recent Consolidated Reports of Condition and Income. However, if an institution crosses either the $50 billion or $100 billion total asset threshold as the result of “a merger, acquisition of assets, combination or similar transaction”, it may, at the discretion of the FDIC, become a Group B CIDI or Group A CIDI, respectively, as of the consummation date of the transaction.
Notifications of “Extraordinary Event”. CIDIs will be required to provide notice and explanation within forty-five (45) days after an “extraordinary event” (referred to as a “material change” in the proposed rule) to the CIDIs organizational structure, core business, size or complexity; identification of material entities or franchise components; mergers or acquisitions; or capabilities described in the resolution submission, except in cases where the notice would fall within ninety (90) days before a regular submission.
Resolution Submission Contents. The final rule requires Group A CIDI resolution plans and Group B CIDI informational filings and their respective interim supplements to address the following contents categories.
Resolution Submission Contents | Group A CIDI >$100B | Group B CIDI $50-100B | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Plan | Interim | Filing | Interim | ||
1 | Identified strategy. An identified strategy for the resolution of the CIDI in the event of its failure that meets the credibility criteria (see below). Must utilize the formation and stabilization of a bridge depository institution (BDI) that continues operation through completion of the resolution unless the CIDI determines and demonstrates in its plan why another strategy would be better. The strategy may not be based on sale or other disposition over a resolution weekend. | • |
|
|
|
2 | Failure scenario. The identified strategy must utilize a failure scenario that demonstrates material financial distress including depletion of capital; must support | • |
|
|
|
3 | Executive summary, describing key elements of the resolution plan, strategy, and actions and changes since last submission | • |
|
|
|
4 | Organization structure, including legal entities, core business lines, and branches, as well as regulated subsidiaries and any value drawn from parent companies or affiliates | • | • | • | • |
5 | Methodology for material entity identification and designation | • |
| • |
|
6 | Separation from parent and potential barriers or material obstacles to orderly resolution. | • |
| • |
|
7 | Overall deposit structure and activities, including insured and uninsured deposits, foreign deposits, deposit sweep arrangements with affiliates and unaffiliated parties, key depositors, and relationships of deposit segments to core business lines and franchise components. | • | • | • | • |
8 | Critical services, including the criteria for identifying them, support and resources, critical services provided by parent company or affiliates, and processes for collecting and monitoring contracts governing critical services | • | • | • | • |
9 | Key personnel tasked with essential roles in support of core business lines, franchise components, or critical services.
| • | • | • | • |
10 | Franchise components, including identification and description of marketable and identification of components that are separable and marketable in resolution. | • | • | • | • |
11 | Asset portfolios, including material assets, their valuation, and identification and discussion of impediments to their sale and timeline for disposition. | • | • | • | • |
12 | Valuation to facilitate FDIC’s assessment of least-costly resolution method (demonstrable capabilities). | • |
|
|
|
13 | Off-balance sheet exposures, such as unfunded commitments, guarantees, and contractual obligations, including qualified financial contracts (QFCs). | • | • | • | • |
14 | Qualified financial contracts, including identification of customers that are counterparties and core business lines and franchise components associated with the transactions | • |
| • |
|
15 | Unconsolidated balance sheet and consolidating schedule for material entities. | • | • | • | • |
16 | Payment, clearing, and settlement systems | • | • | • | • |
17 | Capital structure and funding sources | • | • | • | • |
18 | Parent and parent company affiliate funding, transactions, accounts, exposures, and concentrations. | • |
| • |
|
19 | Economic effects of resolution, including activities or business lines providing a service/function material to a geographic area or other financial institutions. | • |
| • |
|
20 | Non-deposit claims (unsecured creditors) | • |
| • |
|
21 | Cross-border elements, including all components of the parent and parent affiliates that contribute to the CIDI value, revenue, operations outside of the U.S. | • | • | • | • |
22 | Management information systems, software licenses, and intellectual property (detailed inventory, including legal owner/licensor and third-party contracts). | • | • | • | • |
23 | Digital services and electronic platforms offered to depositors to support banking transactions and platform provider (e.g., CIDI, subsidiary, parent, third-party). | • |
| • |
|
24 | Communications playbook, including capabilities and channels to reach personnel, customers, and counterparties. | • |
| • |
|
25 | Corporate governance for resolution planning and senior management designee responsible. | • |
| • |
|
26 | Assessment of the resolution submission, including the viability of the identified strategy (if required) or improvements to any capabilities since last submission. | • |
| • |
|
27 | Any other material factors | • |
| • |
|
Credibility & Review. The final rule incorporates a credibility standard consisting of two prongs for assessing the credibility of a Group A CIDI’s full resolution plan and a Group B CIDI’s informational filing. (Interim supplements will not be assessed under the credibility standard.) The FDIC may determine that a full resolution submission is not credible if:
The FDIC states that it will review full resolution submissions (including informational filings) “promptly and endeavor to give feedback identifying material weaknesses or significant findings within one year of the full resolution submission date.” With regard to these findings:
Engagement & Capabilities Testing. The final rule also amends existing rules to expand direct engagement (information and access to personnel) and capabilities testing (demonstration of capabilities described in the full resolution submission, including the ability to produce timely and useful information and data underlying the resolution submission) between FDIC and CIDIs in the course of regular examinations. The FDIC expects that capabilities testing will be conducted concurrently with the full resolution submission review process (i.e., once every two- or three-years as appropriate) and across a cohort of CIDIs.
Effective Date. The final rule becomes effective October 1, 2024. All CIDIs will receive a written notice specifying when their initial full resolution submission or interim supplement is due. CIDIs that do not file a full resolution submission as their first submission following the effective date are required to provide interim supplements in the years prior to the date their first full resolution submission is due.
Points of View
Insights and analyses of emerging regulatory issues and their impact.
Regulatory Insights View
Series covering regulatory trends and emerging topics
Regulatory Alerts
Quick hitting summaries of specific regulatory developments and their impact.
KPMG Regulatory Insights is the thought leader hub for timely insight on risk and regulatory developments.