Industries

Helping clients meet their business challenges begins with an in-depth understanding of the industries in which they work. That’s why KPMG LLP established its industry-driven structure. In fact, KPMG LLP was the first of the Big Four firms to organize itself along the same industry lines as clients.

How We Work

We bring together passionate problem-solvers, innovative technologies, and full-service capabilities to create opportunity with every insight.

Learn more

Careers & Culture

What is culture? Culture is how we do things around here. It is the combination of a predominant mindset, actions (both big and small) that we all commit to every day, and the underlying processes, programs and systems supporting how work gets done.

Learn more

KPMG reports: Connecticut, Pennsylvania, Michigan

KPMG reports focus on recent state and local tax developments

Download PDF
January 16, 2024

KPMG This Week in State Tax—produced weekly by the KPMG State and Local Tax practice—focuses on recent state and local tax developments.

  • Connecticut: The state Superior Court concluded that a solar power company was not entitled to a property tax exemption for certain personal property used to generate solar electricity The court, looking to the sales tax law, held that the taxpayer was not entitled to the exemption because the generation of electricity is not manufacturing for sales tax or property tax purposes. 
  • Pennsylvania: The state Department of Revenue addressed the new sourcing rules that first applied for tax years beginning on or after December 31, 2022. Under prior law, specific sourcing rules applied to receipts from sales of services and receipts from sales of tangible personal property.
  • Michigan: A city of Detroit income tax dispute came before the Michigan Court of Appeals for the third time. In sum, the appeals court reversed the Tax Tribunal (and its own prior conclusion) and held that a passive holding company formed to hold an investment had nexus with the City of Detroit. The appeals court also rejected the Tribunal’s conclusion that even if there was nexus, the taxpayer nevertheless had no income apportioned to Detroit because each of the numerators of the three-factor apportionment formula was zero.

Read a January 2024 report prepared by KPMG LLP

Thank you!

Thank you for contacting KPMG. We will respond to you as soon as possible.

Contact KPMG

Use this form to submit general inquiries to KPMG. We will respond to you as soon as possible.

By submitting, you agree that KPMG LLP may process any personal information you provide pursuant to KPMG LLP's Privacy Statement.

An error occurred. Please contact customer support.

Job seekers

Visit our careers section or search our jobs database.

Submit RFP

Use the RFP submission form to detail the services KPMG can help assist you with.

Office locations

International hotline

You can confidentially report concerns to the KPMG International hotline

Press contacts

Do you need to speak with our Press Office? Here's how to get in touch.

Headline