The Australian Taxation Office finalized its practical compliance guideline with respect to intangibles arrangements.
The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) on 17 January 2024 finalized its practical compliance guideline (PCG)—PCG 2024/1—with respect to intangibles arrangements.
The final PCG follows two draft PCGs released for consultation over the prior three years, the last one having been released in May 2023. Read TaxNewsFlash
The focus of the PCG is on the structuring aspects of intangible arrangements, that may then be relevant for applying the reconstruction provisions in the Australian transfer pricing rules and also the general anti-avoidance rules (including the diverted profits tax (DPT)).
The ATO makes clear that the PCG does not focus on pricing aspects of intangible arrangements, although the transfer pricing methodology and profit outcomes can impact on the risk rating under the PCG. The PCG also does not cover the potential for embedded royalties and/or royalty withholding tax considerations.
The final PCG maintains a three-part framework:
In addition, Appendix 1 now provides 15 examples of how the RAF tables are to be applied (including commonly observed arrangements such as centralization of intangible assets, bifurcation of intangible assets, migration of pre-commercialized intangible assets, cost contribution arrangements and contract R&D arrangements), and Appendix 2 provides examples of the ATO’s evidence expectations.
Arrangements involving the “migration” of intangible assets or arrangements with similar effect are in-scope of the PCG, which may include arrangements involving Australian development, enhancement, maintenance, protection and exploitation (DEMPE) activities of intangible assets held offshore. The definition of “intangible assets” continues to be consistent with the definition from the 2022 OECD Guidelines and some examples of intangibles in the final PCG (e.g., policies, manuals, standards or protocols) suggest the term is interpreted broadly.
Given the potential breadth of application of the PCG, one of the key changes in the final PCG are three categories of “excluded intangibles migration arrangements” that are carved out of scope of the final PCG:
Another key change is that the ATO has adopted a colored zone system seen in the loan and distribution PCGs for risk differentiation. There are now five zones (replacing the three risk levels in the draft PCG), mapped to aggregate risk points from applying the risk assessment framework:
Additional modifications to the ATO’s compliance approach by risk zone were also made, in particular:
There also were changes made to the RAF tables in Part 2 of the PCG with accompanying explanations, as well as a reweighting of risk points for both RAF tables in the final PCG. Additional changes to the RAF tables include:
There remains, however, an inherent level of subjectivity in evaluating the factors in the RAF tables, which the ATO notes in the Compendium is unavoidable.
Jane Rolfe | janerolfe@kpmg.com.au
Aaron Yeo | aaronyeo@kpmg.com.au
Caleb Han | chan1@kpmg.com.au