Industries

Helping clients meet their business challenges begins with an in-depth understanding of the industries in which they work. That’s why KPMG LLP established its industry-driven structure. In fact, KPMG LLP was the first of the Big Four firms to organize itself along the same industry lines as clients.

How We Work

We bring together passionate problem-solvers, innovative technologies, and full-service capabilities to create opportunity with every insight.

Learn more

Careers & Culture

What is culture? Culture is how we do things around here. It is the combination of a predominant mindset, actions (both big and small) that we all commit to every day, and the underlying processes, programs and systems supporting how work gets done.

Learn more

Israel: Adjusted intellectual property (IP) valuation (District Court decision)

The court determined distinct values for each of the analytical elements in question, reaching an adjusted IP valuation.

July 11, 2024

The Tel Aviv District Court on June 30, 2024, issued a decision delving into elements of intellectual property (IP) valuation analysis. In somewhat of a first for Israel courts, the case centered on specific valuation parameters and valuation analysis; the decision provides a helpful reference in an area that has seen a great deal of local controversy with the Israel Tax Authority (ITA).

The case is: M-Systems Flash Disk Pioneers Ltd/Sandisk IL Ltd v. Tel Aviv 3 Assessing Officer. Read the decision (Hebrew)

Summary

The taxpayer in 2014 sold IP to a U.S. related party at a value of $35 million.

The ITA challenged the valuation analysis that had been performed and issued an assessment according to an adjusted IP value of $136 million.

The case revolved around detailed valuation elements that were fact-specific to the case at hand, including the breakdown of broader intangible assets with regards to the IP assets sold, the projected useful life of the IP, discount rates, forecast growth rates, etc.

The court determined distinct values for each of the analytical elements in question, reaching an adjusted IP valuation of $62.2 million. The decision also upheld a secondary adjustment applying deemed intercompany interest on the additional revenue deemed to have been received by the local entity.

KPMG observation

Claims and issues concerning IP have come up widely in local ITA controversy and post-merger integration planning. While the District Court decision surrounded factors closely connected to the circumstances of the case, this decision provides an important source touching on common analytical elements of IP valuations.

For more information, contact a tax professional with KPMG’s Global Transfer Pricing Services practice in Israel:

David Samson | +(972) 3.684.8970 | dsamson@kpmg.com

Itay Falb | +(972) 3.684.8000 | itayfalb@kpmg.com

Thank you!

Thank you for contacting KPMG. We will respond to you as soon as possible.

Contact KPMG

Use this form to submit general inquiries to KPMG. We will respond to you as soon as possible.

By submitting, you agree that KPMG LLP may process any personal information you provide pursuant to KPMG LLP's Privacy Statement.

An error occurred. Please contact customer support.

Job seekers

Visit our careers section or search our jobs database.

Submit RFP

Use the RFP submission form to detail the services KPMG can help assist you with.

Office locations

International hotline

You can confidentially report concerns to the KPMG International hotline

Press contacts

Do you need to speak with our Press Office? Here's how to get in touch.

Headline