Czech Republic: Beneficial ownership of royalties; VAT exemption for intra-community supply; proof of “essential costs”
Recent tax-related decisions of the Supreme Administrative Court (SAC)
Recent tax-related decisions of the Supreme Administrative Court (SAC)
The KPMG member firm in the Czech Republic has prepared reports on recent tax-related Supreme Administrative Court (SAC) decisions (read more at the hyperlinks provided below).
- The SAC held (4 Afs 63/2022) that a UK company was not the beneficial owner of royalties received from a Czech company because it was obliged to pay almost 95% of the funds received to other related parties and thus was not free to make decisions about the use of the funds. Read a March 2024 report
- The SAC denied the taxpayer’s claim for the value added tax (VAT) exemption for the supply of goods to another EU member state because the taxpayer failed to satisfy its burden of proving that the goods had been supplied to a person registered for tax in another member state. The SAC stated that the mere payment for goods does not prove that all conditions for VAT exemption have been met, especially if payment is made from a bank account of an entity other than the declared customer. The taxpayer also did not have any documents proving that the goods had been ordered or received by a particular person in another member state. Read a March 2024 report
- An extended chamber of the SAC held that a taxpayers must prove “essential costs” (i.e., costs that must have been necessarily incurred in order to generate undisputed taxable income, such as the purchase of a car as a precondition for generating income from its sale). It is not appropriate for the tax authority to resort to using aids to support a finding that a taxpayer may deduct essential costs. Read a March 2024 report
The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organization. KPMG International Limited is a private English company limited by guarantee and does not provide services to clients. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. The information contained herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 3712, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.