Industries

Helping clients meet their business challenges begins with an in-depth understanding of the industries in which they work. That’s why KPMG LLP established its industry-driven structure. In fact, KPMG LLP was the first of the Big Four firms to organize itself along the same industry lines as clients.

How We Work

We bring together passionate problem-solvers, innovative technologies, and full-service capabilities to create opportunity with every insight.

Learn more

Careers & Culture

What is culture? Culture is how we do things around here. It is the combination of a predominant mindset, actions (both big and small) that we all commit to every day, and the underlying processes, programs and systems supporting how work gets done.

Learn more

KPMG reports: New Jersey, Washington State, Wisconsin

KPMG This Week in State Tax focuses on recent state and local tax developments.

Download PDF
February 20, 2024

KPMG This Week in State Tax—produced weekly by the KPMG State and Local Tax practice—focuses on recent state and local tax developments.

  • New Jersey: The Superior Court rejected challenges to the Division of Taxation’s regulations governing the requirements needed to substantiate sales and use tax refund claims. The taxpayers challenged the regulations on the basis that they limited the types of proof that could be presented to support a refund claim and were arbitrary and capricious because they unreasonably “restricted taxpayers” ability to prove that tax was erroneously collected or paid. The court disagreed with the taxpayers’ claims, noting that the statute broadly empowered the director to adopt regulations addressing the evidence required, and the regulations were flexible and expressly permitted a taxpayer to submit “alternative proof” that taxes had been paid.
  • Washington State: An appeals court addressed whether amounts paid to one party under a purported joint venture were subject to business and occupation (B&O) tax. The taxpayer argued that the payments it received were not taxable because they were reimbursements of the expenses of a joint venture that were not subject to B&O tax. The court, after reviewing the parties’ agreement, disagreed. In the court’s view, the reimbursed amounts were “gross income” of the taxpayer’s business received as compensation for services rendered. The court did not address whether the parties had formed a joint venture as it was clear that the payments were taxable even if a joint venture existed.
  • Wisconsin: The Tax Appeals Commission addressed the sharing of losses after combined reporting became effective beginning with the 2009 tax year. The commission concluded that pre-2009 net business losses (NBLs) incurred by entities that were members of a combined reporting group beginning in 2009 could not be shared with members of a new combined group when the entities incurring the NBLs left the former combined group and joined a new combined group.

Read a February 2024 report prepared by KPMG LLP

Thank you!

Thank you for contacting KPMG. We will respond to you as soon as possible.

Contact KPMG

Use this form to submit general inquiries to KPMG. We will respond to you as soon as possible.

By submitting, you agree that KPMG LLP may process any personal information you provide pursuant to KPMG LLP's Privacy Statement.

An error occurred. Please contact customer support.

Job seekers

Visit our careers section or search our jobs database.

Submit RFP

Use the RFP submission form to detail the services KPMG can help assist you with.

Office locations

International hotline

You can confidentially report concerns to the KPMG International hotline

Press contacts

Do you need to speak with our Press Office? Here's how to get in touch.

Headline