Trend #4: Embedded leases
Fergason discussed a ‘sleeper’ issue that has become prevalent – identifying embedded leases in service contracts that include use of a specific asset. A common example is a contract manufacturing arrangement using equipment customized to the customer’s specifications, but several types of contracts can contain embedded leases – e.g. infrastructure as a service/server hosting arrangements and virtual nursing contracts.
Fergason and Newell discussed four accounting questions relevant to these transactions that will drive the accounting outcome.
Is there an identified asset in the contract or can the service provider provide the service using different assets? Also, what is the service being provided – the use of an asset or the output of that asset?
Does the customer have the right to direct the use of that identified asset and does it obtain substantially all of the economic benefits of that asset?
If there is a lease, can one or both parties elect a practical expedient under ASC 842 (leases) to not separately recognize the embedded lease?
If there is a lease, are there multiple lease components? What if the lease term is longer than the useful lives of certain components?
Trend #5: Virtual power purchase agreements
Another popular transaction in 2023 has been virtual power purchase agreements (VPPAs), which can allow a purchaser to meet clean energy goals without altering its power structure.
Shaw explained that unlike in a traditional power purchase agreement, the purchaser in a VPPA doesn’t take delivery of power. Instead, it pays a fixed price per unit of power and receives a floating price. This power component is settled monthly, similar to a fixed-for-floating swap. The fixed price provides the right to receive renewable energy credits (RECs). The power component and the number of RECs is based on actual production during the settlement period.
Ismail explored the ASC 815 implications, noting that in most instances the contract is not a derivative. If the contract is not a derivative, the buyer evaluates whether the REC should be recorded as an asset or immediately expensed and the accounting for the cash settlement component. Shaw noted there is diversity in practice, but that the FASB has a related project on its technical agenda.