Supreme Court overturns ‘physical presence’ standard in Wayfair decision
Defining Issues | July 2018
The Court’s decision makes it clear that businesses can no longer rely on lack of physical presence to avoid collecting and remitting sales and use taxes.
Share
Applicability
South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc. No. 17-494 (S.Ct. June 21, 2018)
- Companies doing virtual business in states with an ‘economic nexus’ law
Relevant dates
- Effective immediately.
Key Impacts:
- On June 21, 2018, the Supreme Court overturned its previous decision that a state cannot require a business to collect sales and use taxes from customers in states where the business has no physical presence
- The decision paves the way for states that have adopted an economic nexus law to begin requiring the collection of sales and use taxes if the law does not otherwise violate constitutional principles
- While the Court did not resolve all issues in its decision, it is clear that businesses that do not collect and remit sales and use taxes cannot continue to rely on not having a physical presence when doing business in states with economic nexus laws
- We believe that those companies will need to consider whether the Court’s decision means that they will need to recognize financial statement liabilities and provide additional disclosures
Report contents
- Applicability
- Key facts and impacts
- Financial reporting implications – Obligating event has occurred
- Financial reporting implications – Contingency exists
- Financial reporting implications – Income taxes
- SEC reporting considerations
- SEC reporting considerations – Internal controls
Download the document
Supreme Court Wayfair decision
Download PDF