It’s the ultimate Goldilocks dilemma: If you leave too much wealth to your children, there’s the risk of entitlement, dependency and demotivation. If you leave too little, you fear it will lead to resentment, financial insecurity and discord within the family. So, how much wealth to pass down is just right?
This dilemma is becoming more common as baby boomers age and wealth transfers accelerate. With more liquidity events—such as business sales—happening, finding the right amount to leave to the next generation is top of mind for many families.
At the heart of the question is a twin desire that most parents share: to see their children succeed and to protect them from financial hardship. But this often collides with the goal of fostering independence, motivation and responsibility. Judging by the rising wave of wealth transfers—and the growing number of Family Office clients seeking guidance on that Goldilocks sweet spot—this dilemma is only intensifying.
Families focused on “how much?” are asking the wrong question. The real issue isn’t about the numbers—it's about the readiness.
As an avid cyclist and runner, I can offer a comparison. Let’s say you’re preparing for a marathon or long-distance cycling race. Without proper preparation—nutrition, rest and a solid training plan—you’re setting yourself up for failure (ask my younger, newbie self about the consequences of running a half marathon without adequate prep). Success depends on months, or even years, of training, mental preparation and strategy.
The same concept applies to wealth transfer. It’s not about the size of the inheritance at the finish line—it’s about how well-prepared the next generation is to handle it. Whether it’s $1 million, $10 million or $100 million, you can’t expect your children to manage wealth responsibly if they haven’t been informed, educated and equipped to steward it effectively.
So, the real question isn’t how much to pass on to the next generation, it’s how do you prepare them.