cancel

Consumer Duty - increasing incomes by improving outcomes

How to make Consumer Duty both a regulatory and commercial success

A girl smiling while working on laptop

August 2024

Quite rightly, firms have been laser-focused on designing, delivering and evidencing good outcomes under the Consumer Duty. However, if done successfully, now is the optimum time for firms to maintain momentum and turn this focus on the commercial value — as well as the outcomes — that the Duty can generate.

To make a genuine success of the Duty, firms should consider not only regulatory alignment and embedding of the Duty, but also embrace the considerable commercial upsides that the Duty can generate.

“Consumer Duty: The prize is huge if we get this right”

 
Sheldon Mills, FCA

In this article, we explore the three core components that required for a firm to fully reap the benefits of the considerable cost and effort expended on the Duty. These components form a package. Imagine them as a three-legged stool, with each required to deliver a solid platform — without one the stool tips over:

Consumer duty success chart

Alignment to FCA expectations

Firms will need to comfortable that their designed solution is aligned to FCA's expectation — and, critically, that the firm can generate the appropriate evidence to the substantiate the outcomes being delivered.  
  • Finalise implementation. There will be an expectation from the FCA (sooner rather than later) that firms have fully implemented all residual activity from their implementation plans — and can evidence this. Notwithstanding the iterative nature of the Duty, across open and closed products, firms should be seeking to determine which activities are achieving full compliance versus those which are tactical fixes and will undergo further enhancements. This will allow firms to reach a definitive and final position on implementation. In KPMG's professional experience, on open products, these are more likely to be IT (data and MI) upgrades, culture enhancements and/or remediation activities. For closed products, there is typically a tail of customer communications and product uplift activities underway (although there may be some residual work for open products too).

  • Respond to FCA findings. The FCA has been proactive in sharing its initial findings on implementation of the Duty with a range of good and poor practice findings on different topics — and we know that more are coming. Firms will need to use these to benchmark and recalibrate their approach to meeting the various requirements. Given the sector-agnostic nature of the Duty, this should include consideration of findings from other sectors. As such, we expect approaches to evolve, especially in the short term, as firms address FCA findings.

  • Anticipate future FCA supervision. Unlike any other regulatory change, the FCA has been proactive in terms of pre-announcing its areas of interest and focus. Sheldon Mills has also announced that FCA will publish a Grid detailing and timetabling further FCA reviews on components of the Duty. Therefore, firms should re-acquaint themselves with relevant Dear CEO and portfolio letters to anticipate specific further challenge on key topics. From this, firms should develop the evidence required (addressing any shortfalls as they find them) to respond appropriately to FCA information or evidence requests. This will help firms get on the front foot and pre-emptively ensure they are maximising alignment to FCA expectations. 

Fully embed the Duty

Firms will want to ensure the new approach is fully embedded thrught the firms. This will require further work to optimising it to be both more effective and more efficient. This will also ensure the sustainability of alignment to the Duty. 
  • Deploy into the target operating model (TOM). This will require firms to ensure their target operating model supports the successful transition of the Consumer Duty from a project or programme basis to a state where the TOM is updated to ensure that it is embedded across all customer journeys, product lifecycles and relevant departments. Only by effectively embedding it, will alignment to the Duty be long term, dynamic and sustainable.

  • Embrace data, technology and tooling. Given the pace at which firms have implemented the Duty, firms are now turning their attention to embracing and deploying technology and tooling to move from a tactical approach to a more strategic, elegant, efficient and effective one. For example, this could include implementing a `voice of the customer' platform to improve insights received from clients. Linked to the above, it will also make adherence to the Duty more enduring.
     
  • Evidence cultural alignment. KPMG professionals are also seeing significant activity to benchmark and evidence cultural alignment, as well as any further enhancements or improvements required or being progressed to ensure that delivering good customer outcomes is part of the firm's embedded culture and purpose. This includes engaging with both employees and customers to genuinely evidence alignment of the firm's culture and purpose to the Duty. 

Explore commercial upsides

Finally, there are the commercial upsides of the Duty which, to date, have not been significantly explored by firms. The majority of activity has been in aligning to FCA expectations and embedding. However, this risks missing the significant commercial opportunity that the Duty can generate. `Just' meeting and embedding changes driven by the Duty will represent a sub-optimal outcome and potentially a poor return on investment from all the costs and effort to get to this point. Transitioning to consider the commerical value as well as the outcomes that the duty can deliver should complete the journey firms have been on.
  • Strategy and business model opportunities. Having embedded the duty, there is an opportunity for firms to re-assess their strategy and business model to drive towards a culture of customer centricity. This can be achieved by redesigning the target-state customer journey using insights from the experience of implementing the Duty. This has the potential to increase revenue, retention, customer satisfaction and attract new customers, whilst reducing costs.

  • Proposition innovation. The richer data set and more forensic analysis of product features (including their price and fair value), and how they perform via outcomes testing will identify opportunities. These include product rationalisation as well as new product innovation, identifying previously hidden opportunities and customer needs. Redesigned, insight led customer journeys will help firms reimagine existing products and services or create new ones based upon a deeper understanding of customer outcomes. 

  • Operating cost and control reduction. Finally, when fully embedded there is a significant opportunity for firms to reduce costs, either by reducing operating costs or reducing controls to reflect the more customer centric nature of the firm. Consequently, the firm is more likely to automatically align to the Duty and therefore require fewer detective controls than previously. This allows control functions to be repurposed into more proactive and supportive roles — rather than reactive remediation or identification of detriment activity. A deeper understanding of target-state customer journeys provides opportunities to remove friction and align products to channel preferences, reducing costs to serve.

Conclusion

KPMG in the UK's view is that Consumer Duty success can only really be achieved once the three legs have been fully considered and addressed. It would represent a significant missed opportunity if firms focused solely on aligning to FCA expectations and/or embedding the Duty without recognising the opportunities that it presents.

Critically, a successful implementation of the Duty cannot be achieved unless you have all three present. The below table illustrates different approaches to implementing the Duty, and the associated regulatory challenges and opportunities. While some categories illustrate intentional non-compliance, there are others where a lack strategic thinking or misunderstanding can result in issues. Firms can reflect on the categories to understand where they fall.

Consumer duty success table

How KPMG in the UK can help

We have extensive insights and further thinking on how the Duty may evolve that we'd be delighted to share on the above core activities. More generally, KPMG in the UK continues to support firms with (i) price and fair value peer analysis to help Duty alignment, (ii) designing and deploying technology and tooling solutions and target operating models to accelerate embedding of the Duty, and (iii) increasingly developing strategies and solutions to take advantage of the commercial opportunities that the Duty offers. These cover areas such as customer journey transformation, `voice of the customer' technology, and integrated and cohesive customer support approaches. If you would like to hear from experienced KPMG professionals or if you require specific support on your Consumer Duty programme, embedding activities, or commercial considerations, please do not hesitate to get in touch. All our other articles on Consumer Duty are accessible on our Consumer Duty hub.  

Our Insights

Read more

How to make Consumer Duty both a regulatory and commercial success
Read more

Consumer Duty

Raising the bar for consumer protection

Contact us

Philip Deeks

Retail Conduct, Regulatory Insight Centre

KPMG in the UK

David Miller

Partner, Risk Consulting

KPMG in the UK

Mita Dave

Partner, Risk and Regulation

United Kingdom

Daniel Barry

Partner, Wealth & Asset Management

United Kingdom


Connect with us

KPMG combines our multi-disciplinary approach with deep, practical industry knowledge to help clients meet challenges and respond to opportunities. Connect with our team to start the conversation.

Two colleagues having a chat