Half of a travel day must be allocated to the country of departure and half to the (final) country of arrival. That is what the Dutch Supreme Court (Hoge Raad) ruled in a judgment rendered on the business trips made by a goalkeeper coach.1 At issue was whether a travel day had to be allocated as a working day to the country of departure, the country of arrival, or to both.
WHY THIS MATTERS
The Supreme Court has provided clarity on the treatment of travel days. This is an important judgment on the allocation of salary for tax purposes of an employee who makes business trips and is subject to tax in more than one country.
Avoidance of Double Taxation
Employees who work in more than one country and are subject to tax in more than one country should keep a record of how many days they work in the relevant countries. Based on that record, the salary can then be correctly allocated to the countries that are allowed to tax the salary.
The case in question concerned a goalkeeper coach residing in the Netherlands who worked in Saudi Arabia and made business trips to other countries. The Dutch Supreme Court ruled that:
- the travel time of a business trip counts as time spent on the performance of the employment, regardless of which activities are performed during the travel time;
- this time must be ‘equally’ divided between the countries the individual travels to or travels from;
- no account must be taken of where any activities − not including the travel time − are performed on that day.
This means that travel days on which the employee has only spent part of the day in the country of employment, cannot be fully allocated to that country. The Supreme Court thus rejected the earlier judgment rendered by the Court of Appeals Amsterdam,2 which had ruled that travel days could be fully allocated to the country of employment.
How This Applies to Other Tax Treaties
The Supreme Court recognised the importance of a straightforward and practical application of the tax treaty. Dividing travel days equally between the country of departure and the country of arrival provides a workable method that takes the actual circumstances into account without making this unnecessarily complex.
Although the case specifically concerned the tax treaty between the Netherlands and Saudi Arabia, the Supreme Court’s reasoning can also be applied to tax treaties the Netherlands has concluded with other countries.
The judgment can likewise be relevant in non-treaty situations. This means that taxpayers who work and travel in more than one country may be confronted with these same principles for the purposes of the allocation of their income.
MEIJBURG & CO. INSIGHTS
In rendering this judgment, the Supreme Court has provided clarity on the treatment of travel days. Although the judgment contributes to a straightforward allocation of (business) travel days, it also raises questions about the practical implementation of this. For example, what about the employee who makes a short one-hour trip early in the morning and spends the rest of the day in the other country? What if the other country has another approach and therefore another allocation of the salary? It is now up to taxpayers and the Dutch tax authorities to apply these rules in practice. We would like to emphasise once again how important it is to carefully document the time spent traveling and working.
If you have questions or concerns about the allocation of salary when working internationally, please consult with your usual tax adviser or contact a member of the People Services-tax team with Meijburg & Co. in the Netherlands (see the Contact Us section).
FOOTNOTES:
1 Hoge Raad 24 januari 2025, ECLI:NL:HR:2025:109.
2 Hof Amsterdam 24 augustus 2023, ECLI:NL:GHAMS:2023:2079
More Information
DIsclaimer
The information contained in this newsletter was submitted by the KPMG International member firm in the Netherlands.
GMS Flash Alert is a Global Mobility Services publication of the KPMG LLP Washington National Tax practice. The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organization. KPMG International Limited is a private English company limited by guarantee and does not provide services to clients. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. The information contained herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation.
© 2025 Meijburg & Co is a partnership of limited liability companies under Dutch law, is registered in the Trade Register under number 53753348 and a member firm of the KPMG global organization of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company limited by guarantee. All rights reserved.