FR – “Forfait Social” Due on Certain Directors’ Fees

The remuneration paid to members of boards of directors or supervisory boards, still often referred to as "attendance fees," is subject to a rather atypical social and tax treatment in France.¹

The Cour de Cassation, the highest court in France’s judicial system, recently decided that directors’ fees paid to members of the supervisory board of a French company are subject to a tax, called “forfait social,” irrespective of the tax residence status of the recipient of the fees or whether the recipient is covered by the French social security system.²

Why This Matters

European Union (EU) law in the field of social security coordination aims at eliminating or reducing obstacles to the free movement of persons between EU member states.³

In this long-awaited decision, judges held that directors’ fees, paid by a French company to a director covered by the Belgian social security regime, are subject to the forfait social.

French companies paying directors’ fees should review their compliance obligations and costs in light of the ruling, as they may be treating such remuneration differently than perhaps ought to be the case in light of this ruling.

Forfait Social and Directors’ Fees

Fees received by board members who are not employed and not assimilated as employees within the meaning of France’s social security legislation, are not subject to social security contributions as income from activity. They are treated as investment income and attract a 20-percent flat-rate tax called “forfait social.”

The funds collected are allocated to certain social security programmes but do not provide any entitlement to social security benefits for the recipients of the income.

Cour de Cassation Case

The Cour de Cassation sought to answer the following matter: if the forfait social is considered a social tax, then the question arises as to whether it is due when the recipient of the fees is not subject to France’s social security system.

The Court held that the forfait social did apply to the fees paid to the member of the supervisory board of a French public limited company regardless of nationality and tax residence despite the fact that he was covered by the Belgian social security system. The Court refused to transfer the case to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) for a preliminary ruling on the grounds that it did not see any infringement to the principle of the “unicity” of the applicable social security legislation.

KPMG Avocats Insights

On a first reading of the decision, one might think that this is the end of the matter. However, the description of the facts was not altogether clear, which suggests that the subject is not really closed. Although the CJEU has ruled on various cases of socially-earmarked taxes, there are no clear and reliable guidelines to draw the necessary conclusions as to whether they fall within the scope of EU Regulations on the coordination of social security within the EU.

In view of the decision, French companies paying directors’ fees to individuals outside of France should seek advice regarding their compliance obligations. Advice should also be sought by non-French companies paying directors’ fees to French residents (a situation not covered by this decision).

Contacts

Alain Loehr

Partner

KPMG in France

mail
call

Ann Atchade

Partner

KPMG in France

mail
call

Additional Resources

Download the PDF

Download

GMS Flash Alerts by country
GMS Flash Alerts by topic

Footnotes

¹ For a brief discussion of the current tax treatment of board members’ income, see section 2.6 of the “Taxation of International Executives: France,” a publication of KPMG International.

² Cass. 2nd civ. 6-6-2024 n ° 21-23.396 F-B (in French).

³ This is an overarching principle of EU legislation: so as to avoid conflict of laws (whether positive or negative), a person is subject to the social security law of one country only and this is determined by Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004, on the coordination of social security systems.

Disclaimer

The information contained in this newsletter was submitted by the KPMG International member firm in France.

GMS Flash Alert is a Global Mobility Services publication of the KPMG LLP Washington National Tax practice. The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organization. KPMG International Limited is a private English company limited by guarantee and does not provide services to clients. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. The information contained herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation.

© 2024 KPMG Avocats, société d’avocats de droit français, membre de l’organisation mondiale KPMG constituée de cabinets indépendants affiliés à KPMG International Limited, une société de droit anglais (« private company limited by guarantee »). Tous droits réservés. Le nom et le logo KPMG ainsi que le nom KPMG Avocats sont des marques utilisées sous licence par les cabinets indépendants membres de l’organisation mondiale KPMG. Pour en savoir plus sur la structure de l’organisation mondiale KPMG, rendez-vous sur la page https://kpmg.com/xx/en/misc/governance.html (en anglais).

France – Court Confirms “Forfait Social” Due on Certain Directors’ Fees Paid by French Companies