Canada – Rules on Residential Property Purchases by Nonresidents Impact Relocation Costs

GMS Flash Alert 2023-005 | January 11, 2023

In GMS Flash Alert 2022-213 (December 2, 2022), we reported on the new laws passed in 2022 and the related updates to existing taxes that will potentially impact residential real estate in Canada for individuals relocating to and from Canada.

Regulations that were issued on December 2, 2022 (see GMS Flash Alert 2022-227 December 23, 2022) clarified who is prohibited from purchasing residential real estate in Canada during 2023 and 2024. This law will impact the relocation industry in terms of the two-transaction process1 that is used to expedite the employees’ home sale and facilitate a successful relocation.2 The recent regulations in Canada prohibit foreign-owned Relocation Management Companies (RMCs) and foreign-controlled Canadian subsidiaries from purchasing Canadian homes for relocated employees. This may result in taxable benefits on the reimbursement of home-sale costs because these relocation companies will not be able to execute any two-transaction home-sale programs on Canadian relocations. 

Why this matters

As we describe in this newsletter, absent changes to recently promulgated regulations, non-Canadian-controlled employers and non-Canadian-controlled RMCs will not be able to execute any two-transaction home-sale programs on Canadian relocations, which will severely hamper their ability to facilitate Canada-outbound relocations. 

This in turn could increase the relocation costs incurred by employers who will need to gross-up the employees for home-sale costs for moves from Canada to certain non-Canadian jurisdictions where home-sale costs are considered taxable benefits if not executed as a two-transaction home-sale program.

Background

The government of Canada recently passed the Prohibition on the Purchase of Residential Property by Non-Canadians Act (the Act), which prohibits nonresidents from purchasing residential real estate in Canada for a two-year period3. This law came into effect on January 1, 2023. The supporting Regulations to the Act that were issued on December 2, 2022, indicate that non-Canadian citizens include Canadian companies that are controlled by non-Canadians.

RMCs are used in instances where the relocated employee is not able to sell his or her current home in a timely manner. They may also be used to help ensure sale and closing costs are paid for directly by the RMC, instead of by the employee. The RMC, acting on behalf of the employer, purchases the home so that the employee has the funds to purchase a new home in the new employment destination. The RMC’s home purchase also means that the employee doesn’t have to incur additional costs of owning two homes at once. If an RMC isn’t used, some employers choose to enter into an agreement to purchase the home directly from the employee (essentially accomplishing the same results as with using an RMC).

Effect on Canadian Relocation Companies and Employers

Because many Canadian RMCs are foreign-owned, they can no longer purchase residential real property under a two-transaction home-sale program. Foreign employers or non-Canadian-controlled subsidiaries are also prohibited from these types of transactions for their relocated employees who have a Canadian home to sell.

Employers may now be faced with having to reimburse the employee for the ongoing home-sale costs instead.

The law allows the Canadian Minister of Finance to issue regulations defining “control” and “what constitutes a purchase.” The Canadian Employee Relocation Council (CERC) has approached the Canadian government to exempt relocation transactions from this new law but have been unsuccessful in their attempts to date.4

KPMG Insights

Under Canadian tax law, the reimbursement of home-sale costs is generally nontaxable. However, if a relocation involves a transfer out of Canada (i.e., move to the U.S., the U.K., or another jurisdiction with similar tax laws), the reimbursement may result in a taxable benefit to the employee. If the employer wants to make sure the employee is no worse off, a gross-up on the taxable benefit would be required, which in turn would add to the cost of the relocation. 

Where possible, employers should seek to hire Canadian-controlled RMCs if they wish to continue to utilize the two-transaction home-sale programs on Canadian relocations.

Contacts

Sonia Gandhi

Partner

KPMG in Canada

Additional Resources

pdf

Download the PDF


Footnotes

1 Also referred to as a “home-sale program” which helps employees expedite their move to the new work destination while minimizing relocations costs to the employee and employer. There are typically two approaches to this type of program: 1) the RMC buys the home directly from the employee if it has sat on the market unsold for a certain period of time, or, 2) once the homeowner has received a competitive outside offer, the RMC buys the home and incurs all of the selling expenses. The RMC then sells the home to the outside buyer.

2 See "Prohibition on the Purchase of Residential Property by Non-Canadians Regulations: SOR/2022-250" at: https://canadagazette.gc.ca/rp-pr/p2/2022/2022-12-21/html/sor-dors250-eng.html .

3 For the text and status of Bill C-19, see the Parliament of Canada webpage: https://www.parl.ca/legisinfo/en/bill/44-1/c-19 .

4 CERC Member Bulletin December 21, 2022, "Prohibition on the Purchase of Residential Property by Non-Canadians Act." https://www.cerc.ca/news/626678/PROHIBITION-ON-THE-PURCHASE-OF-RESIDENTIAL-PROPERTY-BY-NON-CANADIANS-ACT.htm .


Disclaimer

The information contained in this newsletter was submitted by the KPMG International member firm in Canada.

GMS Flash Alert is a Global Mobility Services publication of the KPMG LLP Washington National Tax practice. The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organization. KPMG International Limited is a private English company limited by guarantee and does not provide services to clients. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. The information contained herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation.

We respectfully acknowledge that KPMG offices across Turtle Island (North America) are located on the traditional, treaty, and unceded territories of First Nations, Inuit and Métis peoples.

© 2024 KPMG LLP, an Ontario limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organization of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company limited by guarantee. All rights reserved.

For more detail about the structure of the KPMG global organization please visit https://kpmg.com/governance