Looking ahead — simplification or complication?
Looking ahead, pressures to simplify regulatory frameworks and requirements are likely to persist in both the EU and UK. However, this should not be categorised as deregulation, rather as a recalibration of the volume and complexity of regulatory requirements. For some, particularly international firms, the regulatory environment may become more complex, at least in the short term, as simplification measures may differ in scope across the UK and EU.
Key simplification initiatives in the immediate future look set to be of greatest benefit to asset managers. The European Council and Parliament are negotiating on the Commission’s proposed amendments to the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) which would make disclosures clearer and more accessible for investors, while reducing compliance costs for firms.
The UK FCA has also committed to streamlining its sustainability reporting framework for asset managers and FCA-regulated asset owners, recognising the challenges that firms have faced in complying with existing requirements.
In other areas, firms should expect continued, targeted intervention to address material and emerging sustainability risks.
The ECB will continue to assess banks against its detailed climate and environment-related risk requirements, with the potential for financial penalties where they are not met. It has recently reiterated its commitment to three priority areas: the transition to a green economy (including assessing banks’ prudential transition plans), coping with the physical impacts of climate change (including banks’ capabilities in managing these risks) and assessing the impact of nature-related risks.
The European Supervisory Authorities’ joint guidelines on ESG stress testing will apply from 1 January 2027. National Competent Authorities (NCAs) will use 2026 to consider how to integrate ESG risks into their supervisory stress tests, either by integrating the risks into existing frameworks or designing adverse scenarios in a complementary assessment.
At a global level, the IAIS has raised concerns about how natural catastrophe insurance protection gaps could have a systemic impact on financial stability, especially in emerging markets.
Meanwhile, UK firms await the outcome of consultations on transition plans and the UK Sustainability Reporting Standards (SRS). The FCA is expected to consult imminently on SRS-aligned and transition plan disclosure requirements for UK listed companies.
Measures are also advancing to improve transparency and integrity in capital markets. HM Treasury (HMT) has now laid down draft legislation to bring ESG ratings providers within the FCA’s regulatory remit. The FCA is consulting until 31 March 2026 on its proposed approach, with a final policy statement expected in H2 2026 – firms wishing to provide certain types of ESG ratings in the UK will need FCA authorisation from 29 June 2028. ESMA has published technical standards for regulating ESG ratings providers in the EU, with the EU regime applying from July 2026. IOSCO’s recent report on ESG benchmarks emphasised the need for strong governance, accountability and methodological integrity, noting that existing principles require adaptation to address the evolving nature of ESG data and methodologies.