cancel

KPMG Regulatory Barometer - H2 2024

Insights for the changing world
sky-satellite-window

Measuring the impact of regulatory and supervisory activity

The KPMG Regulatory Barometer helps firms identify the key areas of pressure across the evolving UK and EU regulatory landscape.

Financial Services firms need to handle frequent regulatory updates from multiple sources and it can be difficult to distil the impacts of regulatory change and supervisory actions into a single view. 

Ongoing geopolitical tensions, uncertain economic conditions, changing customer demands and behaviours, sustainability concerns and use of new technologies are all influencing regulatory agendas. 

The Barometer:

  • Delivers a consolidated source of regulatory intelligence.
  • Assesses the extent of regulatory pressure across key themes.
  • Provides a single metric to represent the size and complexity of the challenge.

A regulatory impact score is calculated for each of the Barometer key themes based on attributes such as volume of regulatory updates, materiality, time to implementation and supervisory intensity. The theme scores feed into a single overarching metric that represents the overall level of regulatory pressure. 

There has been some movement in relative pressures, however the overall picture for firms remains consistent in terms of the sustained need to respond to regulatory change and heightened supervisory intensity.

Rob Smith

Partner and Regulatory and Risk Advisory Lead

KPMG in the UK

rob smith

Quantifying regulatory pressure 

Welcome to the latest edition of the KPMG Regulatory Barometer – measuring the impact of regulatory and supervisory activity. 

The aggregate regulatory pressure score for this edition of the Barometer is 7.3. Access the full report here.

overall-pressure-graph


KPMG Regulatory Barometer - H2 2024

Insights for the changing world


Key messages

Political changes in the last six months have resulted in some regulatory policy activity being put on hold. Competitiveness and growth are expected to be key areas of government focus in both the EU & UK, eventually having a regulatory impact. 

  • Financial Resilience retains the top spot and is now joined by Operational Resilience. Both reflect a refocusing on critical processes, operations and metrics in the wake of market events and score highly in terms of both policy pressure and supervisory intensity. Finalisation of significant policy initiatives and approaching implementation deadlines are contributing factors. 
  • ESG and Sustainable Finance remains very high on the regulatory agenda, but there has been a small drop in score. We attribute this to a slowing in publication of new policy, either due to election quiet periods or pending the outcome of reviews in progress. It is possible that the score will tick back up in the next 6 to 12 months. Supervisory intensity is also likely to pick up on the back of the FCA's AGR and implementation of the CSRD and other reporting requirements and associated assurance requirements. 
  • Renewed policy interest in how financial services firms and the capital markets can contribute to the growth agenda is influencing regulatory pressure. Policymakers are considering ways to drive investment to the domestic economy – including into infrastructure and unlisted assets.
  • There has been a resurgence in pressure around Customer Protection. This has been heavily influenced by the volume, proactivity and targeted nature of supervisory attention that UK’s FCA is dedicating to Consumer Duty. 
  • The score for Digital Finance has increased but not enough to challenge Customer Protection. Digital remains an area where there is a lot of noise in the market, but less in terms of concrete policy and specific actions required from Financial Services firms.
  • The score for Accessing Markets has fallen, once more, as post-Brexit policy and supervisory measures increasingly transition to business as usual activity. 

Theme overviews

  1. Delivering ESG and sustainable finance

    Preparations for the implementation of CSRD from 2025 and SDR in the UK require significant work and investment from firms. Reporting requirements will continue to expand as focus on nature and social issues intensifies and as IFRS S1 and IFRS S2 are adopted more widely – including new standards in the UK. Anti greenwashing measures are now in place and prudential regulators expect further progress on climate and environment-related risk. Meanwhile SFDR continues to be a moving target. And markets initiatives are progressing. Looking ahead, the EU’s CSDDD will be a significant addition to the corporate sustainability landscape. 

  2. Maintaining financial resilience

    Prudential regulators are focused on maintaining and reinforcing firms’ financial resilience, and on balancing emerging and ongoing risks with opportunities to promote competitiveness. Pressure for banks and insurers is intense as complex frameworks are finalised and key implementation dates approach. Supervisory activity has ramped up, particularly in areas such as resolution preparedness/wind-down planning, governance and risk management. MiFID firms are under significant scrutiny now that the policy framework is well embedded.

  3. Regulating digital finance

    The digitalisation of financial services continues, including accelerated adoption of innovative technologies, providing enormous benefit to both customers and service providers. However, innovation also introduces novel risks which could pose a threat to consumer protection and, on a wider scale, to financial stability. Regulators are now more advanced in the development of relevant frameworks, with some key components already going live. 

  4. Strengthening operational resilience

    Regulatory initiatives have developed rapidly across the globe to meet the increasing challenges of a more technology-dependent and interconnected financial sector and the evolving threat landscape. Implementation deadlines are approaching rapidly with EU DORA compliance expected by 17 January 2025 and completion of UK requirements by end-March 2025. Digital (including cyber) resilience remains a key area of focus and new, stringent requirements for critical third parties to the financial sector are expanding the regulatory perimeter.

  5. Payments

    The rapid evolution of the payments landscape is challenging policymakers and regulators to foster an environment that supports old and new payment types and continues to meet customer needs. The UK and EU are seeking to achieve this through infrastructure enhancements, by creating opportunities for competition and innovation and by introducing stronger consumer protection measures.

  6. Enhancing customer protection

    Customer outcomes, value for money and vulnerable customers remain key areas of key regulatory focus. UK firms must continue to work on genuinely embedding the Consumer Duty and are starting to consider the associated commercial opportunities. The FCA is using the Duty proactively as a supervisory tool and challenging firms hard to supply data and evidence. Parallel policy proposals are taking shape under the EU’s proposed Retail Investment Strategy. 

  7. Growing capital markets

    Capital market regulations implemented post-GFC continue to go through a period of amendment due to reviews in the EU and by international bodies, and tailoring to the UK market post-Brexit. There is a growing focus on adapting regulation to increase the international competitiveness of capital markets. Now that international regulators have made progress with policy across several priority topics, attention is turning to implementation, and new focus areas such as private assets. Focus on the resilience and efficiency of market infrastructure continues.

  8. Accessing markets

    In some cases, there has been a positive move toward more open markets for financial services firms with the conclusion of the UK-Swiss Mutual Recognition Agreement and finalisation of the UK’s Overseas Funds Regime. However, this is countered by ongoing supervisory scrutiny of firms’ wider use of cross-border arrangements, particularly for firms providing services into the EU. Eight years on from the EU referendum, activity is now tailing off, to some extent, as EU authorities move into a steady-state phase.

  9. Reinforcing governance expectations

    Supervisors continue to reinforce the need for good corporate governance, including the effective management of conflicts of interests, embedding appropriate accountability, robust oversight by non-executive functions and clear audit trails for decisions. Regulators recognise the positive impact that diversity, equity and inclusion can have on firms and their customers. Focus on the effectiveness of AML controls and sanctions is also strong, with measures being taken to improve international coordination between regulators.


EU and UK regulation – alignment or divergence?

Post-Brexit, the EU and UK are now following their own policymaking agendas. However, fundamental regulatory concerns continue to be shared and the first Joint EU-UK Financial Regulatory Forum has established the framework for ongoing discussion and collaboration.

Divergence of policy detail and timing increases complexity for cross-border firms. The UK has begun to tailor rules to a more UK-centric and principles-based style of rulemaking, while the EU has its own complex legislative agenda for financial services. Both jurisdictions are considering the impact of regulation on competitiveness.

As part of the Edinburgh Reforms, HMT is moving forward with the repealing and reforming of 43 ‘core files’ of retained EU law in a way that is ‘thoughtfully planned and sequenced to minimise unnecessary disruption while taking the opportunity to maximise the potential for the greatest economic impact’. The Treasury Select Committee reported that progress has been too slow, to which the government responded by asserting that the current plans allow an appropriate amount of time for consultation and implementation.

EU and UK regulatory requirements align to different extents across the nine Barometer themes – in some cases reflecting different starting points due to previous UK and EU Member State ‘gold-plating’ and national rules.

eu-uk-regulation

Related content

Regulatory Insights

Providing pragmatic and insightful intelligence on regulatory developments.
concrete tunnel, 3D illustration, rendering.

Contact us 


Connect with us

KPMG combines our multi-disciplinary approach with deep, practical industry knowledge to help clients meet challenges and respond to opportunities. Connect with our team to start the conversation.

Two colleagues having a chat