This article was first published in CNBC TV18 Access on April 08, 2026. Please click here to read the article.

      Boardrooms don’t lack data; what they lack is decision clarity under compression. In a year where economic signals, geopolitics, technology shifts, and stakeholder scrutiny collide, effective oversight is about joining the dots – not necessarily adding more. This means aligning strategy, risk appetite, incentives, and culture – and hardwiring agility into decision rights, information flows, and committee architecture.

      Board of Directors today are operating in a landscape where volatility is structural, not episodic. Trade fragmentation, policy divergence, technology controls, and shifting alliances are now enduring design constraints, requiring strategies built for contested markets rather than stable global norms. At the same time, risk has evolved from narrow “IT risk” to enterprise wide business systems risk, as AI and data permeate core operations and governance failures surface as customer harm, regulatory breaches, or reputational damage. Importantly, as complexity rises, the board’s effectiveness hinges less on operational depth and more on clarity of questions, guardrails, and escalation – staying firmly in oversight while enabling management speed. This is reinforced by a shift from compliance signaling to execution credibility, with regulators and investors testing whether ERM responses are genuinely operational – owned, resourced, and time bound. For boards, the challenge is no longer recognising these shifts, but ensuring governance is calibrated to act decisively within them.

      Key risk lenses for 2026

       
      • Critical dependency concentration
      • Substitutability & reconfiguration speed
      • Policy-driven market access risk
      • Trade, sanctions & tech-control exposure
      • AI model integrity & data origin
      • Autonomous decision-risk governance
      • Digital resilience & ecosystem dependency
      • Third-party and cloud concentration risk
      • Sustainability disclosure credibility
      • Capital allocation vs ESG signaling

      Source: KPMG in India Analysis - (Drawn from aggregated regulatory, supervisory, investor, and enterprise risk assessments rather than firm specific disclosures)



      Priorities that separate resilient boards from reactive ones 

      Re‑anchor risk oversight to enterprise value. Treat risks as intersections (economic–geopolitical–technology–talent–supply chain), not silos; align strategy, risk appetite, controls, incentives, and culture so risk‑taking is intentional and rewarded appropriately. 

      Make geopolitics part of design, not disclosure. Scenario planning should test combined shocks (policy, market access, logistics, data/tech controls), backed by decision rights that enable fast reroutes of capital, suppliers, and routes when signals flash – with the board setting thresholds and guardrails, not directing tactics.

      Govern AI like infrastructure. Move beyond pilots: clarify use cases, elevate data quality/governance, stage deployments, measure value, and install guardrails as AI autonomy rises – while actively assessing second‑order impacts on roles, skills, capacity planning, and leadership pipelines.

      Secure the digital core. Oversight must integrate data governance + cyber; emphasise resilience and recovery (not just prevention), readiness for AI‑enabled threats and quantum risk, and clarity on third‑party exposures.

      Sustain long‑term value without ESG fatigue. Prioritise what’s financially material in your sector and jurisdiction; ensure disclosure readiness and ownership match the rigour applied to financials.

      Culture and succession at the top. A board–CEO dynamic that values informed challenge over comfort is a leading indicator of enterprise health; succession must be scenario‑based and live – particularly as technology reshapes leadership bandwidth and decision cadence.



      Oversight moves that can raise the bar this year

      • Re-cut committee charters to reflect interconnected risks; hard-wire cross-committee information flow and escalation
      • Install a ‘signals and thresholds’ dashboard (policy moves, market access, supplier stress, data incidents) tied to pre agreed decision rights for rapid manoeuvre
      • Commission independent challenge (economists, policy and trade experts, AI risk advisors) at set intervals to puncture groupthink and refresh scenarios
      • Run an executive-ready crisis drill combining cyber + supply chain + regulatory shock, with the board observing decision velocity and hand-offs.

      In 2026, boards won’t win by forecasting the next shock. They’ll win by designing for shocks – clarifying decision rights, rehearsing hard choices, and insisting that strategy, risk, and culture cohere under stress. For complex institutions, the hallmark of a strong board is disciplined oversight that sharpens management judgment without diluting accountability. The hallmark of a resilient board this year is not the thickness of the pack but the precision of its choices – and the credibility with which those choices can be executed.


      Author

       

      Manoj Kumar Vijai

      Office Managing Partner - Mumbai, Head - Risk Advisory

      KPMG in India

      How can KPMG in India help

      Conventional approaches to risk and regulatory compliance are no longer sufficient in today's intricate world where finance, trade, technology, and environment intersect in new and evolving ways

      #RiskMatters – focusing on all matters relating to risk, with emphasis on identifying and tapping opportunities emanating from risk

      BLC benchmarks leading practices in corporate governance and extends actionable thought leadership, peer council and networking forums to board member


      Access our latest insights on Apple or Android devices