The article was first published in The Economic Times Edge Insights.com on January 30 2026. Please click here to read the article.
India’s public sector energy companies were often spoken of as symbols of stasis that characterised the economy – too large to fail, too slow to change, and too bound by bureaucracy and procedure. Yet, somewhere between a smoky kitchen in rural India switching to LPG, municipalities replacing dimly glowing incandescent bulbs with LEDs, and a fossil heavy electricity grid now absorbing large quantities of solar and wind, that narrative has quietly given way over the past decade.
The last 10–12 years have not been kind to complacent energy companies anywhere in the world. Volatile commodity prices, climate pressures, technological disruption, and changing consumer expectations have upended business models. Many of them have found it hard to stay on course. For India’s energy PSUs – IOCL, BPCL, HPCL, ONGC, NTPC, Coal India and others – this was the period of reinvention, re-definition, and positive momentum.
The Paris Climate agreement in 2015 unleashed a new wave of thinking on clean energy. Various international energy organisations have reacted differently – some defensive, some in denial and others blowing hot and cold. This was not entirely unexpected because it is hard for traditional capital heavy and operationally complex companies to reinvent themselves and compete with nimble new age counterparts. India’s public sector energy giants reacted differently. They acted with a sense of purpose to deepen their commitment to their traditional businesses but also opened doors for the new. In doing so they walked the tightrope between executing policy goals of the country, embracing the emergent opportunities and maintaining commercial discipline. What unfolded since then is not just operational scaling, but a deeper transformation in purpose, capital allocation, and engagement with people.
The energy PSUs grasped the unique nature of the opportunity and that there was room for many new businesses. In essence they embraced what has since been coined as “and ” instead of “or ” strategy. They were less affected by ideology as compared to many global compatriots. That openness and faith is now showing in the commercial outcomes, making them both feared and respected as competitors.
Tracing the development of the PSUs over the last decade several inflection stages become apparent. Through these stages the organisations have acted, learnt and evolved.