We also look beyond our own footprint toward ways that we can make a difference through our client
work, with third parties and through what the Science-Based Targets initiative (SBTi) refers to as
“beyond value chain mitigation.” This includes investing in carbon credits and nature
initiatives to support the global effort to reach net-zero. For KPMG, our current approach includes an
investment of more than US$1 million across a number of our firms in WWF
conservation and nature restoration projects, as well as buying credits from voluntary carbon markets.
Our main priority, however, remains our own internal decarbonization. In FY23, we had a 4 percent
increase in gross emissions from the prior year due to the reintroduction of business
travel following COVID-19 lockdowns. However, this still represents a 22 percent reduction against our
FY19 baseline year, and we also managed a reduction in emissions intensity across several key
indicators.
Our Scope 1 and 2 net emissions continued to decrease: a 12 percent reduction
compared to FY22. The reductions we achieved in Scope 1 and 2 emissions are due to the continuation of
hybrid working and the initiatives KPMG firms have been implementing to improve energy efficiency.
These are funded in some KPMG firms by the implementation of an Internal Carbon Price (ICP), a
monetary value on greenhouse gas emissions which businesses can then factor into
investment decisions and business operations. Reporting KPMG Firms have implemented ICPs ranging from
US$15 to US$85 per tCO2e, in line with their decarbonization priorities and national economic
circumstances — with KPMG firms planning increases in line with their future decarbonization
investment plans and focusing on managing emissions such as air travel.
Our total electricity usage decreased slightly despite our growth, with the proportion of renewable
energy across our global organization increasing from 79 percent in FY22 to 81 percent in FY23. With
all our Reporting KPMG Firms having now transitioned to renewable electricity, the challenge is to
ensure that the remaining KPMG firms can also transition in a just, fair and equitable manner. KPMG
firms that are yet to source renewable electricity are typically located in
countries and regions where availability of supply and prohibitive prices are potential obstacles.
Despite this, we remain committed to our goal of using 100 percent renewable electricity across our
global organization by 2030 as we recognize that our commitment helps drive wider energy transition
goals.
While overall we saw a modest increase in Scope 3 of 3 percent, business travel
emissions increased significantly, primarily due to increased air travel emissions. While air travel
emissions increased by approximately 77 percent compared to FY22, this total remains 40 percent lower
than our FY19 baseline. The rise in air travel is principally due to our people beginning to reconnect
with client and team members following post-COVID-19 travel restrictions as
well as organizational growth and a change in emissions factors. Importantly, due to proactive travel
management, the implementation of sustainable travel guidelines across KPMG firms, and the
behavior-changing influence of our ICP, this ‘rebound’ in air travel has not brought us back to
pre-pandemic levels.
We remain vigilant in collectively managing business travel across the organization, as it remains a
vital component to achieving our 2030 target and our overall ambition to decouple emissions from
growth.
The accepted standards to calculate emissions factors for air travel emissions have also changed due
to passenger loads changing as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic — meaning that, in FY23, those who
flew needed to account for a greater proportion of emissions1, which accounts for a
proportion of our air travel emissions growth.