error
Subscriptions are not available for this site while you are logged into your current account.
close

Loading

The page is loading.

Please wait...

    Loading

    The page is loading.

    Please wait...

    The Evolution of Build Vs Buy

    In Artificial Intelligence
    Abstract purple 3D shapes

    As Artificial Intelligence (AI) continues to reshape industries, executives face a critical decision: should they build a custom AI solution in-house or buy an existing one from a third-party provider? This "build vs. buy" dilemma is both a technical and strategic decision with significant implications for a company’s competitive advantage, innovation, and growth.

    This dilemma is like the one business have where they had to decide whether to build custom software vs. buying off-the-shelf solutions. Businesses had to weigh up the advantage of having a tool built around their unique processes even though it would come with high costs, lengthy development times, and complex maintenance. Cloud computing shifted the landscape towards off-the-shelf solutions like Microsoft Dynamics, promising faster implementation and standardised processes.

    Today, the AI landscape presents a new iteration of this challenge, forcing companies to carefully consider whether to invest in building a tailored AI system or leverage existing solutions that offer faster, more cost-effective deployment. From a new survey conducted by KPMG LLP*, executives report that Generative AI (GenAI) is already significantly impacting their strategic planning, with the majority expecting positive Return on Investment (ROI) within the next three years.

    Leanne Allen

    Partner, Head of AI Advisory

    KPMG in the UK

    Key Decision Forces and Market Influence

    Over the last year, GenAI has been front and centre of all C-suite’s minds looking to revolutionise how their businesses operate. The growing number of use cases—from enhancing customer experiences to optimising operational efficiency—is driving this momentum as organisations seek to create new opportunities.

    A KPMG LLP survey revealed that:

    • 50% of organisations are buying or leasing their GenAI from vendors.
    • 29% are pursuing a mix of building, buying, and partnering.
    • 12% are building GenAI solutions in-house.

    The AI Dilemma

    Implementing AI into a business is a significant challenge, with key factors to consider:

    • Data Quality, Security and Model Choice
    • Cost of Deployment
    • Talent and Skills Gap
    • Speed to market and Differentiation
    • Risk management
    • Control

    Data Quality, Security and Model Choice

    At the front of the conversation is the reliability of data and trust for AI adoption. The underlying requirement is to have strong data governance, which includes data privacy, security and compliance with all relevant regulations. Fifty-five percent of companies cite data quality as a major barrier to AI adoption, and organisations spend up to 80% of project time just preparing data.

    "Data is often an obstacle to the business adoption of AI... Do they trust what the model or algorithm is going to be telling them?"
    – Tom Ramjeet – Senior Manager, Data & Analytics

    Legacy systems also pose a major roadblock. Many older technologies are incompatible with modern AI, leading to costly updates and increased technical debt. Even when AI is implemented, the results have shown that 30% of models fail to scale due to poor maintenance and integration, impacting ROI.

    The choice of model is important too. To ensure the AI outputs are fair, biases must be controlled from the data level and from the model. It is critical to establish data guidelines and frameworks to remove biases and choose or build models that are built from the correct learning models, trained with the right datasets and apply fairness metrics to minimise the impact. Regularly auditing the model's performance would reduce this impact, however this would require expertise and cost.

    Cost of Deployment and Competitive Advantage

    Businesses must carefully consider whether to build AI solutions in-house or rely on third-party vendors.

    "Buy feels like it's more expensive than build, but that's not always the case if there is not a clear strategy in place" 
    – Rajinder Rai – Director, Tech & Transformation

    Building internally requires a company culture ready for trial and error, as success may not be immediate. It would require an operating model shift – looking into an investment in people, processes, data and in house technology infrastructure.

    "If you choose to build, you need to be in the mindset of being prepared to test and learn because you won’t get it right first time."
    – Tom Ramjeet – Senior Manager, Data & Analytics

    On the other hand, buying is a quick way of building capability within your organisation. However, businesses must consider their AI use case and whether it supports core differentiation. Bharat Bhushan, Partner, Data Architecture and Platforms, KPMG noted in an interview, "If it's something that differentiates you... you probably want to own that IP," to develop unique capabilities instead of relying on generic products. He also points out that "if you are dealing with standard off-the-mill items, you wouldn't need to do a custom build," indicating that off-the-shelf AI products can be more efficient for routine tasks.

    "If you get a vendor to build a certain feature, you might have an exclusive period... but after that, everybody in the industry has that feature." 
    – Bharat Bhushan – Partner, Tech & Data

    Finally, organisations must weigh the potential loss of competitive advantage that comes with shared features in externally built solutions.

    Talent and Skills Gap

    "What do you currently have internally? How do you understand what skills you need to have or invest in for your target state?" 
     Rajinder Rai – Director, Tech & Transformation

    Developing AI solutions requires expertise in machine learning, data science, and software engineering—skills that are in high demand but short supply, with roles growing 74% annually. This talent crunch makes it difficult for companies to recruit and retain the professionals needed to build robust AI systems. More than half of businesses in the UK (51%) acknowledge that they don’t have the right mix of skilled AI talent in-house to bring their strategies to life.

    "Organisations that are being seen to be more proactive with adopting AI are offering more exciting career opportunities... they’re going to get the best talent." 
    – Rajinder Rai – Director, Tech & Transformation

    Companies that invest in upskilling existing employees and creating a culture that fosters continuous learning are better positioned to attract and retain top talent. However, to effectively address this skills gap, C-suite executives must conduct a comprehensive assessment of their current talent pool and identify the specific competencies required for their AI initiatives.

    Strategic Insights for AI Integration: KPMG AI Strategy

    When deciding between building or buying an AI solution, it’s essential to align the decision with the company’s overarching strategic goals and vision. KPMG’s AI Strategy proposition considers a company’s AI journey from a strategic perspective, including value assessment, strategy, and business case development.

    Businesses need to apply a decision framework, assessing factors like:

    1. Core Functionality: What percentage of needs are met by off-the-shelf solutions?
    2. Configurability: How flexible are the configuration options of potential 'buy' solutions?
    3. Integration Capabilities: Are essential capabilities accessible via APIs?
    4. Building Requirements: For bespoke needs, can low-code platforms or APIs be used?
    5. Team Capabilities: Does the organisation have the right mix of skills to use the available tools effectively?

    The Strategy AI proposition guides clients through the essential phases of AI decision-making and business case development.

    Step 1: AI Value Assessment
    Goal: Identify high-impact AI opportunities

    Understanding key GenAI use cases is crucial for how the business can drive growth. This assessment will pinpoint areas within the business capabilities that can yield significant ROI, allowing you to define new strategic objectives that align with growth objectives and set up a path for the future.

    Step 2: AI Strategy
    Goal: Define your AI vision and objectives

    The key aspect here is to clearly articulate an AI vision and ambition through establishing key performance indicators (KPIs). This will lead to outlining future business models from the analysis and prioritisation of AI use cases. Guiding the business toward whether to Buy or Build their AI solution.

    Step 3: AI Business Case
    Goal: Secure investment and operationalise AI

    To gain the necessary approvals and funding, we will provide a detailed cost and timeline estimate for your AI initiatives. This includes a comprehensive implementation plan that addresses dependencies and a strategy for realising the benefits of AI, ensuring you capture maximum value from your investments.

    Embracing a More Flexible Future

    The build vs. buy decision is no longer a simple choice between two extremes. As technology continues to evolve, particularly in AI, organisations will need to adopt a flexible approach, balancing the benefits of standardised solutions with the need for customisation to meet unique business challenges.

    The key for businesses is they must consider the strategic vision and goals to enable their growth through the utilisation of AI.


    Our Artificial Intelligence insights

    Something went wrong

    Oops!! Something went wrong, please try again

    Get in touch

    Read enough? Get in touch with our team and find out why organisations across the UK trust us to make the difference.

    Person smiling whilst using a mobile phone