U.S. banks were amongst the pioneers of data management, embedding the role of the CDO into their organization, with a strong emphasis upon technology and IT. In Europe, on the other hand, the concept of CDO is at a relatively earlier stage, although banks in this latter region are more likely to hand the incumbent a wider brief that covers data management and strategy.
By taking central responsibility for data, including ownership of central data hubs, the CDO can be a ‘standard setter’, to establish and monitor common standards for data, and lead a bank-wide data strategy with full board commitment. This gives the CDO a mandate, with real rights of intervention embedded in strong governance.
“ESG in particular has brought a whole new world of data to the forefront” says Rachel Tracey, Partner Financial Services Technology Enablement, KPMG in the UK. “CDOs should oversee data collection and processing, to ensure high-quality data from reliable sources.”
The CDO should also become a proactive service provider, supporting the implementation of data standards, and building an active data community, working closely with IT and other functions. As guardian of an integrated data architecture and interface landscape, the CDO communicates reliable sources of information, and helps ensure that data storage and interfaces are expanded sensibly, to avoid duplication.
Another key activity is to manage complexity, by recording, prioritizing, consolidating and harmonizing the data requirements of different functions, in a way that is aligned with the bank's strategic data agenda. The CDO can help accelerate the safe use of Gen AI, by prioritizing data use cases, enabling banks to adopt technology at speed, and to offer sophisticated digital services to customers.
According to Chris Ayres, Partner, Trusted Data Lead, KPMG Australia, “AI brings exciting opportunities for banks, but calls for strong governance from CDOs, to ensure ethical and quality guardrails, to deliver safe outcomes and preserve customer trust.”
Numerous regulatory requirements have large overlaps, which calls for a centralized approach to compliance. Consequently, the CDO should remain the central point of contact for external and internal auditors and the supervisory authority, with responsibility for monitoring existing and upcoming regulations.