Skip to main content


      The 7 June 2026 deadline for EU member states to transpose Directive (EU) 2023/9701 on pay transparency (the “EU Pay Transparency Directive”) has passed. While national implementation is uneven, the directive’s first EU‑wide reporting deadline for employers with 150+ employees remains 7 June 2027—making payroll, compensation, recruitment, and job architecture readiness an immediate operational priority.

      Non‑EU employers with operations, employees, or recruitment activities in the EU are also in scope and should assess now how the new rules affect their global reward, data, and talent strategies.

      For previous coverage see KPMG Flash Alert 2025-148.


      WHY THIS MATTERS

      The 7 June 2026 transposition deadline for the EU Pay Transparency Directive was met by only four EU member states - Italy, Lithuania, Malta, and Slovakia - while many others are now rushing draft laws through their legislative processes.2

      The missed transposition deadline should not be read as additional time for employers. For companies operating in several EU jurisdictions, implementation will now be country‑specific, potentially compressed, and dependent on each employing entity’s worker count, local rules, and data availability.

      The directive requires more than a legal policy update. Employers will need reliable data on pay, gender, worker categories, basic salary, variable pay, and work of equal value. Where this information sits across disconnected HR, payroll, compensation, and recruiting systems, 2027 reporting and employee‑information requests may become manual reconstruction exercises under statutory timelines.


      Background

      The EU Pay Transparency Directive requires EU member states to implement new pay‑transparency rules in national law. Its core purpose is to make the principle of equal pay for equal work or work of equal value between women and men enforceable in practice, not just on paper.

      The directive creates a tight, data‑heavy framework that reaches well beyond traditional “gender pay gap reporting.” It shapes how employers advertise roles, conduct pay discussions, classify jobs, and respond to employee‑information requests.

      Crucially, non‑EU employers are not exempt. Any non‑EU headquartered group with:

      • EU‑based employing entities,

      • EU employees on local or global contracts, or

      • recruitment activities targeting candidates in the EU

      will be caught where those activities fall under a member state’s implementing law. For many multinationals, this means pay‑transparency obligations will apply to a mix of EU and non‑EU legal entities and payrolls, creating a cross‑border compliance challenge rather than a purely EU‑domestic one.

      The EU Transparency Directive in Practice

      The directive creates a set of employee rights and employer duties that apply across the employment lifecycle: how roles are advertised, how pay is set, and how employees can challenge differences. Its aim is to make equal pay for equal work or work of equal value enforceable in practice.

      Recruitment and Pay Transparency

      On recruitment, employers must give candidates the initial pay level or pay range early in the process and may not ask about current or past salary.

      Non‑EU groups recruiting into EU roles need to align global job ads, recruiter scripts, and offer templates with these rules whenever the job is based in, or mainly performed from, an EU country.

      Employee Access to Pay Information

      Once employed, workers can request their own pay level and the average pay levels—broken down by sex—for colleagues doing the same work or work of equal value. Employers must be able to explain the criteria used to set and progress pay, and those criteria must be accessible, objective, and gender‑neutral.

      These rights apply to EU‑based workers even if payroll is run from a non‑EU shared‑service centre.

      Objective, Gender‑Neutral Pay Criteria (with Example)

      Job evaluation and grading systems must use neutral, fact‑based criteria such as skills, effort, responsibility, and working conditions. “Equal value” does not necessarily mean the same job title.

      For example, if a female payroll manager and a male IT manager carry comparable responsibility, complexity, and impact, their roles may be considered of equal value, and unjustified pay differences between them can be challenged.

      Gender Pay Gap Reporting and Joint Assessments

      Covered employers must report gender pay indicators, including overall and median gaps, differences in variable pay, the distribution of men and women across pay quartiles, and gaps by category of worker split into basic salary and complementary or variable components.

      Non‑EU multinationals must be able to isolate EU entities within global HR and payroll data and reliably extract the figures each country’s rules require. If reporting reveals an objectively unjustified gender pay gap of at least 5% in a category of workers and it is not remedied within six months of the report’s submission, a joint pay assessment with worker representatives may be triggered, potentially leading to formal remediation measures and legal exposure.

      Reporting Obligations and Deadlines

      The directive staggers gender pay gap reporting by employer headcount. These thresholds apply to any employing entity covered by national implementation, including EU subsidiaries or branches of non‑EU groups.

      Employer size

      Reporting frequency

      First report under the Directive

      250 or more workers

      Annually

      By 7 June 2027, relating to the previous calendar year

      150–249 workers

      Every three years

      By 7 June 2027, relating to the previous calendar year

      100–149 workers

      Every three years

      By 7 June 2031, relating to the previous calendar year

      Fewer than 100 workers

      Not required by the directive, unless national law extends reporting

      No EU-level reporting date

      How Non‑EU Employers Come into Scope

      Non‑EU headquartered groups are in scope whenever they:

      • operate EU subsidiaries or branches that employ staff,

      • second or assign workers into the EU, or

      • recruit for roles located in the EU, even if recruitment and payroll are managed from outside the EU.

      In practice, this turns the directive into a binding framework for the EU part of a global organisation, with knock‑on effects for global job architecture, pay bands, and data structures.


      KPMG INSIGHTS

      For multinational employers, the core risk is no longer just “Has our country transposed the directive?” but “Can we reliably identify the right workers, job categories, pay components, and reference periods for every covered employing entity—on demand and at scale?”

      The legal obligation sits at member state level; the operational pressure sits in company data, systems, and job architecture.

      Organizations that wait for final national rules before acting may find they have little time left to fix data gaps, reconcile inconsistent job structures, explain pay differences, or stand-up processes for employee information requests. Early payroll and workforce‑data diagnostics can turn 2027 reporting from a one‑off project into a repeatable compliance process.

      Key focus areas emerging in practice include:

      • Moving from policy to data readiness: Confirm which EU (and EU‑facing) employing entities fall within the directive’s thresholds, and map national implementation timelines against your corporate calendar.

      • Job architecture and “equal value”: Review job families and grades against objective, gender‑neutral criteria so that “same work or work of equal value” can be applied consistently across entities and countries.

      • Structuring pay components: Separate ordinary basic wage or salary from complementary and variable pay at the record level so the required indicators can be calculated without manual reconstruction.

      • Testing systems and processes: Stress‑test HR, payroll, compensation, and recruiting systems—wherever hosted—to confirm they can produce directive‑compliant reports and respond to individual information requests within statutory deadlines.

      • Governance and remediation: Define ownership for methodology, data quality, and sign‑off, and establish escalation paths for unexplained pay gaps, including when joint pay assessments may be triggered.

      For non‑EU headquartered groups, the directive effectively sets a common minimum standard for the EU part of the business. Aligning global reward, HR technology, and data governance to that standard now can reduce the risk of fragmented, country‑by‑country fixes later—and help ensure that EU‑driven changes support, rather than disrupt, broader global reward strategy.

      Contacts

      Daida Hadzic

      Director, Washington National Tax – Global Mobility Services

      KPMG in the U.S.

      More Information

      pdf

      Download PDF

      Download and save the PDF version of this GMS Flash Alert.

      GMS Flash Alert reports on recent global mobility-themed developments from around the world to help you better understand what has changed and what that means for you.


      GMS Flash Alert

      Shedding light on evolving policies affecting international assignees and employers, helping make sense of it all.

      alt
      Disclaimer

      The above information is not intended to be “written advice concerning one or more federal tax matters” subject to the requirements of section 10.37(a)(2) of Treasury Department Circular 230 as the content of this document is issued for general informational purposes only.

      The information contained in this newsletter was submitted by the KPMG International member firm in the United States.

      GMS Flash Alert is a Global Mobility Services publication of the KPMG LLP Washington National Tax practice. The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organization. KPMG International Limited is a private English company limited by guarantee and does not provide services to clients. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. The information contained herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation.

      © 2026 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organization of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company limited by guarantee. All rights reserved.