error
Subscriptions are not available for this site while you are logged into your current account.
close
Skip to main content

Loading

The page is loading.

Please wait...


      From values‑led reporting to assured credibility

      For many family businesses, sustainability reporting has historically been values‑led rather than rules‑led. Stewardship of people, communities and assets is often deeply embedded, even if it has not always been formally documented or externally assured. The move to UK Sustainability Reporting Standards (UK SRS), and the accompanying focus on assurance and variability, marks a meaningful shift, not just in compliance expectations, but in how credibility and trust will be judged.

      Shashi Prashad

      Tax Partner KPMG Enterprise

      KPMG in the UK


      Olivia Edwards

      Family Business Relationship Lead

      KPMG in the UK


      Confidence, assurance and the risk of variability

      At its heart, the discussion on assurance under UK SRS is about confidence. Regulators, lenders, investors and customers are increasingly relying on sustainability information to make decisions. As reporting becomes more standardised, variability in interpretation and assurance practices inevitably emerges. For family businesses, this creates both a risk and an opportunity.

      One of the report’s key themes is that sustainability information will not be equally assured across all metrics, at least initially. This phased approach is pragmatic, reflecting the reality that data maturity varies widely. For family firms, this mirrors their own experience: environmental data may be relatively robust, while social or governance metrics can be more qualitative, relationship‑driven and harder to evidence consistently. The challenge is that what feels intuitive internally now needs to stand up to external scrutiny.


      Translating trust into evidence

      This is where family ownership dynamics matter. Unlike widely‑held public companies, family enterprises often rely heavily on trust built through long‑standing relationships with stakeholders. UK SRS shifts the basis of trust from reputation alone to documented, assured information. That does not diminish the value of values, but it does require families to articulate them in a language that external parties can rely on.

      Assurance introduces discipline. Even limited assurance forces clearer definitions, stronger controls and more consistent data collection. For family businesses used to flexibility and informal decision‑making, this can feel constraining. Yet many of the risks highlighted by variability under UK SRS, inconsistent methodologies, unclear boundaries, uneven quality, are the same risks that arise during generational transitions, refinancing events or strategic partnerships. Assurance can therefore be seen less as a compliance burden and more as a resilience tool.


      Governance, ownership and assurance readiness

      Crucially, the report underlines that variability itself is not inherently negative. Differences in business models, size, geography and maturity mean sustainability narratives should not be identical. What matters is transparency: being clear about assumptions, limitations and the degree of assurance applied. Family businesses are well placed here. Their long‑term orientation often allows for honesty about progress rather than over‑engineering short‑term optics.

      However, families need to be deliberate about ownership of the sustainability agenda. As UK SRS embeds into reporting cycles, questions arise: who sets sustainability priorities, the family, the board, or management? Who is accountable for data quality? And how are judgement calls governed? The report’s focus on assurance highlights that these are not merely technical questions; they are governance questions.


      Protecting legacy through proportionate assurance

      Another important implication is timing. Many family businesses are private and therefore not immediately in scope of mandatory reporting. But banks, insurers, suppliers and customers increasingly are. UK SRS will cascade through value chains. Waiting until reporting becomes mandatory may mean responding under pressure. Early engagement allows families to shape narratives on their own terms and embed assurance proportionately rather than reactively.

      The concept of “assurance readiness” is therefore particularly relevant. Readiness does not mean having perfect data. It means understanding where variability exists, why it exists, and how comfortable the owners are with the story that produces. Family leaders should ask: if this information were externally assured tomorrow, where would it challenge our assumptions? Where would it strengthen our credibility?

      Ultimately, UK SRS and its approach to assurance signal a shift from intent to evidence. For family businesses built on trust across generations, this is not a departure from purpose, but a translation of it. Those who see assurance as a way of protecting legacy, rather than policing behaviour, are likely to navigate variability with confidence.

      In that sense, sustainability assurance under UK SRS is less about satisfying external standards and more about reinforcing something family businesses already understand deeply: trust, once formalised well, becomes an asset that endures beyond any single generation.


      Our sustainability insights

      Something went wrong

      Oops!! Something went wrong, please try again

      MTD

      Get in touch


      Discover why organisations across the UK trust KPMG to make the difference and how we can help you to do the same.