error
Subscriptions are not available for this site while you are logged into your current account.
close
Skip to main content

Loading

The page is loading.

Please wait...


      HMRC have opened a consultation on proposals to introduce a criminal offence for making reckless untrue statements or declarations in relation to direct tax matters including income tax, corporate tax and capital gains tax. This is intended to create consistency with similar provisions which are already in place for indirect tax and deter reckless behaviour by taxpayers. This would broaden HMRC’s powers and give prosecutors and juries an alternative charge where dishonesty cannot be proved. The new offence would require proof of ‘recklessness’. This is a lower threshold than dishonesty which is the focus of current criminal offences in relation to tax.

      It is proposed that the new offence should carry a custodial sentence of up to two years and/or an unlimited fine. It would be for judges to impose a sentence that properly reflects the seriousness of the offence rather than HMRC.

      HMRC recognise that making reckless untrue statements or declarations in relation to direct taxes can cause significant harm to the Exchequer and such a proposal will help HMRC work at closing the tax gap.

      The proposed offence would be committed when a ‘statement’ or ‘declaration’ is made that is ‘untrue’ (which simply means it is not correct), and the maker of the statement has acted ‘recklessly’. Statements in this context could be written or oral and potentially inclusive of “statements made implicitly by a person’s actions”. This would include individuals and those responsible for tax within entities. 

      Karmjit Mader

      Partner - Tax

      KPMG in the UK


      Kevin Elliott

      Director, KPMG Law

      KPMG in the UK

      HMRC note that, in order for a statement to be considered ‘reckless’, the person making it must have been aware of the risk of their statement’s falsity or lack of truth, and they unreasonably proceeded to make the statement notwithstanding this risk of which they were aware” consistent with established criminal law definitions of recklessness.

      The proposed offence would slot into the existing framework as a new criminal option sitting between civil penalties for carelessness and the current criminal offences for dishonest tax fraud and evasion. We anticipate that HMRC will continue to deal with most errors through the civil regime (where behaviour is categorised as careless or deliberate and penalties are financial) and reserve the traditional criminal offences for cases where there is clear, provable dishonesty and there is a public interest in seeking a prosecution. The new offence is designed to capture serious situations where a person is aware there is a real risk that a statement to HMRC may be inaccurate but proceeds to make it, nevertheless. This offence will therefore not upset the current regime but add an additional option in HMRC’s enforcement toolkit.

      HMRC emphasise that the new offence should not capture accidental errors or misunderstandings and that recklessness requires a higher bar than carelessness or having ought to have known a statement was untrue which is important. That said, the stakes when interacting with HMRC are even higher, signalling the ongoing and continued importance of documenting tax positions and ensuring HMRC communications (written and oral) are clearly thought through.

      HMRC are seeking views from taxpayers on the scope of the new offence, how these proposals will affect compliance behaviour, and challenges or risks that could arise from implementation. The consultation will be open until 16 August 2026. Please speak to your usual KPMG in the UK contact if you would like to discuss this further.

      For further information please contact:

      Our tax insights

      Something went wrong

      Oops!! Something went wrong, please try again