error
Subscriptions are not available for this site while you are logged into your current account.
close
Skip to main content

Loading

The page is loading.

Please wait...


      Family businesses are often defined by resilience. They have weathered recessions, regulatory shifts, changing consumer tastes and generational change by staying close to operations and responding quickly to immediate pressures. Yet Stay still, fall behind highlights a growing risk in today’s environment: when the ‘here and now’ consumes all leadership attention, the future does not pause to wait.

      When short‑term pressures crowd out the future

      The food and drink sector exemplifies this tension, but the lesson travels across all family‑owned enterprises. Rising costs, volatile demand, regulatory complexity and cyber and technology risk are absorbing enormous management bandwidth. In these conditions, prioritising today’s problems over tomorrow’s possibilities feels rational, even responsible. But over time, this mindset can quietly erode competitiveness.

      A central insight of the article is that short‑term survival and long‑term prosperity are not opposites, but they do compete for attention. Many leadership teams recognise the need to invest for the future, yet day‑to‑day pressures inevitably shape decisions. The danger is not poor intent, but slow drift: businesses reach the future only once it has already arrived, leaving little control over how to succeed in it.

      Shashi Prashad

      Tax Partner KPMG Enterprise

      KPMG in the UK


      Olivia Edwards
      Olivia Edwards

      Family Business Relationship Lead

      KPMG in the UK

      The hidden cost of incrementalism

      Technology provides a clear example. Incremental fixes to legacy systems often feel prudent in tough times. They keep the lights on and avoid large upfront investment. But as the article notes, ‘sticking‑plaster’ solutions compound over time. They increase outage risk, slow innovation and make step‑change transformation harder precisely when it becomes most necessary. For family businesses, where operational continuity is often prized, this trade‑off can be especially difficult to confront.


      Disciplines that create space to think ahead

      The insight offers several practical disciplines that resonate strongly with family ownership models.

      First is deliberate time allocation. One retailer cited in the article explicitly structures leadership focus: most effort on today’s delivery, some on the next two to three years, and a protected portion dedicated to looking beyond the immediate horizon. This is not wishful thinking; it is governance by design. For family firms, this approach helps counteract the gravitational pull of day‑to‑day operations, particularly where owners remain deeply involved in execution.

      Second is structured scenario planning, especially at the extremes. Rather than relying on probabilistic forecasts, leaders are encouraged to consider what would happen if disruptive trends fully materialised, or failed entirely. This builds what the article calls ‘leadership muscle’: the ability to respond calmly and decisively under uncertainty. Family businesses often excel at intuitive judgement; scenario planning enhances this strength by making uncertainty explicit rather than implicit.

      Third is the importance of clear, long‑term direction rooted in fundamentals. When the future feels unknowable, it is tempting to defer long‑term thinking altogether. The article argues the opposite. While technologies and channels may change, certain truths endure: customers want value, trust and ease; employees want clarity and capability; systems need reliable data and resilience. For family enterprises built on enduring purpose rather than transient trends, this is familiar territory.


      No‑regret anchors and long‑term resilience

      The idea of ‘no‑regrets anchors’ is particularly useful. These are investments and behaviours that make sense in almost any future. Examples include connected data, enabling technologies that improve decision‑making, and deep understanding of customer behaviour beyond surface‑level trends. For family businesses, such anchors align well with patient capital and multi‑generational thinking.

      The article’s tone is not alarmist, but it is clear. Choosing to focus exclusively on the present is itself a decision, and one with long‑term consequences. Market leaders are not those who predict the future perfectly, but those who create space to think ahead while still delivering today.

      For family business leaders, the challenge is therefore cultural as much as strategic. It requires permission, from owners to management and from one generation to the next, to invest time, capital and attention beyond the immediate storm. This does not mean abandoning prudence. It means recognising that resilience is not only about absorbing shocks, but about evolving in advance of them.

      Ultimately, Stay still, fall behind reinforces a truth many family owners intuitively understand but may struggle to operationalise: longevity is not preserved by standing still. It is preserved by moving forward deliberately, even when conditions make that movement uncomfortable.


      Our consumer insights

      Something went wrong

      Oops!! Something went wrong, please try again


      MTD

      Get in touch


      Discover why organisations across the UK trust KPMG to make the difference and how we can help you to do the same.