error
Subscriptions are not available for this site while you are logged into your current account.
close
Skip to main content

Loading

The page is loading.

Please wait...


      Talk to any executive about decarbonising the tech industry and the conversation quickly veers towards data centres. Rightfully so. Data centres consume huge amounts of energy, and not all of that power is renewable. Recent data suggests data centres globally now generate between 63 and 75 megatons of CO2 equivalent. And demand for data centres is growing at a blistering pace.

      Yet data centres are by no means the tech industry’s worst emitters. That dubious distinction goes to something sitting in your pocket and on the corner of your desk – end-user devices. Indeed, recent research suggests that end-user devices – smartphones, laptops, printers and the like – are responsible for nearly double the CO2 emissions of data centres.

      In many ways, the disparity is a matter of scale. The number of end-user devices currently active around the world dwarfs the number of data centres (rough estimates suggest around 30 billion devices versus around 12,000 data centres globally). And the lifecycle difference means that replacement happens much more frequently – every two years for the average smartphone and four years for a laptop versus up to 15 years for a server.

      That does not make the challenge any easier. Whereas accountability for data centre emissions generally flows through one of a handful of companies globally, accountability for the emissions generated by the production, use and end-of-life processes of end-user devices is widely distributed – right down to individual human beings.

      Daryl Elfield

      Partner

      KPMG in the UK


      Devices will be the death of us

      Assuming countries and companies remain committed to the 1.5-degree pathway outlined in the Paris Agreement, this makes end-user devices a much more pernicious challenge. Recently, KPMG did a bit of modelling to forecast the glide path to net zero by 2050 for both devices and data centres. We only looked at energy consumption – the massive amount of embedded carbon in the device supply chain were not represented. The high-level outcomes are illustrated below.



      What you will notice is that the glidepath for end-user devices is steep and heavily reliant on three levers: energy efficiency, grid decarbonisation and reduced demand. The glidepath for data centres, on the other hand, is shallower and supported by a wider range of technologies and solutions. One clearly carries more risk than the other.


      Ideas everyone can get behind

      The point is that – while data centres certainly deserve scrutiny and support in order for the UK to balance its growth and net zero goals – governments, businesses and tech companies will need to place significantly more urgency on creating solutions to reduce the impact of end-user devices.

      What is clear is that reducing the carbon footprint of the technology sector will rely on smart, swift and sustainable action on end-user devices. And that, in turn, will take significant collaboration between industry (device manufacturers, data centre owners, tech providers, etc) and their commercial and retail customers.

      At KPMG, we work with technology companies, device manufacturers, data centre owners and others across the technology sector to help create, embed and improve sustainable IT strategies. At the same time, our ESG Technology & Data professionals work with clients across industry sectors to help them create more sustainable IT frameworks and assess their IT carbon footprints. Contact us today to find out how we can help your organisation. 

      Our technology insights

      Something went wrong

      Oops!! Something went wrong, please try again

      Get in touch

      Read enough? Get in touch with our team and find out why organisations across the UK trust us to make the difference.

      Person smiling whilst using a mobile phone