error
Subscriptions are not available for this site while you are logged into your current account.
close
Skip to main content

Loading

The page is loading.

Please wait...


      The Scottish Parliamentary election on 7 May 2026 is set against a challenging fiscal landscape, with the Auditor General for Scotland recently warning of a funding gap in the public finances that could reach almost £5 billion by 2030. This already tight fiscal position may be exacerbated by the economic ripple effects from the Iran conflict, as well as warnings of a fall in Barnett formula funding in the coming years.

      Against this backdrop, and with Scotland’s limited borrowing powers, any significant new manifesto commitments from the political parties in the election campaign would imply either higher taxes, lower spending or both. However, unsurprisingly, the manifestos’ focus is on giveaways to voters.

      Although most polls currently project the Scottish National Party (SNP) will have the most Members of Scottish Parliament (MSPs) post-election, forecasts are less clear on the nature of the outcome and whether a majority will be achieved. The absence of a majority could mean coalitions or confidence agreements are required to pass bills in Parliament. Clues as to the future of Scottish tax policy may, therefore, be found in more than one party’s manifesto.

      With six manifesto documents totalling well over 500 pages, this article is not intended to be a comprehensive guide to tax in the manifestos. Rather, it is a high-level comparison of the key pledges in the four largest devolved taxes in Scotland: Income tax, Council tax, Non-Domestic Rates and Land and Buildings Transaction Tax.

      Income tax

      Income tax is the biggest devolved tax revenue raiser for Scotland, accounting for 73 percent (c£21 billion) of all devolved tax revenues in 2025/26. The Scottish Parliament has power to set rates and thresholds for non-savings and non-dividend income of Scottish taxpayers, but the level of tax-free personal allowance and rates for savings and dividend income are reserved to the UK Parliament. Scotland currently has six income tax bands, versus three in the rest of the UK (rUK).

      SNP: continuity but with caveats

      The SNP manifesto promises not to increase the number of income tax bands or their rates over the lifetime of the next Parliament. However, the manifesto states all governments require flexibility to respond to material changes in circumstances in public finances or the global economy, suggesting the SNP reserves the right to increase rates or bands if it considers it to be necessary.

      The manifesto also says the SNP’s aim is to make the tax system simpler by the end of the Parliament. No further details are given, but the independent economic think tank, the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), suggests this could mean reducing the number of tax bands in Scotland. The IFS also points out that, unless the SNP is willing to forgo tax revenue, such simplification would require people in some bands to pay more tax. The manifesto wording implies low and middle income earners would be protected from any such tax rises.

      Scottish Labour: ambition to cut taxes likely to remain just that?

      Like the SNP, Labour promises not to increase income tax rates for the duration of the next Parliament, although it does not specifically mention income tax bands. Labour goes on to say its ambition is to reduce tax rates over the course of the Parliament, but caveats that this will be contingent on delivering growth and closing the economic performance gap (presumably in line with plans set out elsewhere in the manifesto).

      One of Scotland’s leading independent economic think tanks, the Fraser of Allander Institute (FAI), considers the growth and economic performance gap targets set out in the Labour manifesto to be hugely ambitious, making the prospect of future tax cuts seem highly unlikely.

      Reform UK: significant tax cuts but warnings over how these would be funded

      Significant income tax cuts are the flagship measure in the Reform UK tax manifesto. The party pledges to immediately scrap Scotland’s six income tax bands and mirror rUK’s three bands but setting the Scottish rate at 1p below each rUK band, with a medium-term objective of being 3p below each band in the first five years of a Reform Government in Scotland. The manifesto estimates that mirroring the rUK system and the first 1p cut would cost £2 billion, with every 1p cut thereafter costing £850 million each. These are significant tax cuts equivalent to 1.5 percent of Scottish Gross Domestic Product (GDP).

      Reform UK says this would be funded by the re-allocation of £1 billion currently being spent on Net Zero projects and by (presumably reducing) 132 quangos costing £6.5 billion. The manifesto also claims the economic growth generated from this tax cut will easily fund its cost.

      Although neither the IFS nor the FAI dispute the quantum of these costings (albeit both point out that these costs are ongoing per annum, something that is not necessarily clear from the manifesto), each institute is critical of how Reform UK proposes to fund these tax cuts. The Scottish fiscal framework means that cuts to capital investment (which includes much of the spending on Net Zero initiatives) cannot be used to pay for tax cuts. Perhaps more importantly, there is no evidence to support the claim that the tax cuts would lead to economic growth that would make them self-funding, leading the IFS to describe this plan as “not fiscally credible”.

      Scottish Conservatives: again, significant tax cuts but again warnings over how these would be funded

      Like Reform UK, significant income tax cuts are one of the Conservatives’ flagship tax manifesto pledges. The party would raise the point at which all taxpayers start paying income tax in Scotland in line with inflation for every year of the next Scottish Parliament. It would also uprate the 42p Higher Rate threshold throughout the next session of Parliament until it matches the £50,270 threshold in rUK. Perhaps most significantly, the manifesto promises that by the end of the next Scottish Parliament, earnings up to the Higher Rate thresholds would only be taxed at 19p in the £1, lower than rUK (i.e. effectively reducing the current Basic and Intermediate Rates from 20 percent and 21 percent respectively to 19 percent). The FAI and IFS point out these tax cuts would cost around £3 billion per annum.

      Again, both the IFS and FAI question the credibility of funding such giveaways largely through back-office and administrative savings, as has been proposed by the Conservatives.

      Scottish Greens: shifting focus to tax wealth rather than work

      Despite having the most wide-ranging tax manifesto of all the parties, centred around taxing the wealthy and companies that pollute the environment (either through using existing tax powers, or pushing for more devolved tax powers) the Green manifesto is relatively quiet on Scottish income tax.

      The party says it will retain a progressive and redistributive income tax system; set higher rates for landlord’s income from rental properties (to be introduced following the rollout of rent controls to avoid the cost being passed onto tenants); and challenge the UK Government to accept that the power to tax income from shares and dividends is devolved (then set suitably high rates for this unearned income). The party also says it would develop proposals for a Scottish wealth tax, although no further details are given.

      The Scottish Government currently does not have the power to create a bespoke new wealth tax (i.e. an annual tax on individual’s net assets). The Greens plan may be to seek these powers from the UK Government, as proposed in other areas of the manifesto. Absent that power, the Greens may look to existing devolved tax powers to tax a proxy for wealth such as property (e.g. through the Council tax system or Land and Buildings Transaction Tax) or income (e.g. through higher rates of income tax for certain levels or types of income).

      The main comments from the IFS and FAI on this manifesto are the lack of policy detail, in particular policy costings, making it difficult to meaningfully assess the proposals.

      Scottish Liberal Democrats: continuity but with an eye on reform

      The Liberal Democrats have said they will not make “reckless unaffordable promises” but that they don’t think people can pay more tax amidst the current cost of living crisis; the inference here is no tax cuts in the short term, but no tax rises either. The party has said it will prioritise getting Scotland’s finances in shape in order to cut taxes in the future.

      The Liberal Democrats are the only party who have said they will take up the Hunter Foundation on the offer in its Entrepreneurs Manifesto for Scotland (published earlier this year) to fund a specialist team to investigate both the impacts of the current income tax system and to develop a new system that will increase the tax take.

      Council tax

      Council tax makes up 12 percent (c£3 billion) of all devolved tax revenue in Scotland. Like the UK’s equivalent, the system is often cited as needing reform due to the fact that council tax bands are based on the relative values that properties had in 1991.

      SNP, Labour and the Liberal Democrats all say that cross-party consensus on reform of the existing system would be a priority for them in government, although the Liberal Democrats go further to say they would propose a switch to a land value system which would not penalise homeowners for improving their properties.

      The Conservative manifesto has no statements on Council tax and Reform UK simply says that it would immediately cancel the two new council tax bands that were announced at the last Scottish Budget (aka the ‘Mansion Tax’) due to come into force in 2028. The Greens, on the other hand, have confirmed they would go ahead with the Mansion Tax as planned, and propose replacing Council tax with Residential Property Tax based on the value of the property.

      Non-Domestic Rates

      Non-Domestic Rates (NDRs) brought in 11 percent (c£3 billion) of all devolved tax revenue in Scotland in 2025/26. Economists and others have criticised the current NDR system (and the equivalent in rUK, Business Rates) as having disincentives for business growth and creating an unlevel playing field between physical and online businesses. There is consensus amongst the parties that the NDR system requires reform, but prescriptions for remediation vary and, although there are many proposals set out, very little detail is provided on any of the policies.

      The SNP has said it will rebalance the system to make it fairer and more accountable, ensuring online giants pay their “fair share”. Labour’s pledge is to replace NDRs with a Local Business Levy in a revenue neutral way. The Liberal Democrats have said they will work towards a new system of NDRs with a land value element. Reform UK promises to gradually phase out NDRs and Land and Buildings Transaction Tax (see below) over 10 years in a revenue neutral way, rolling them into an Annual Property Tax. The party has also pledged to immediately reverse the NDR revaluation that took effect in April 2026. 

      The Greens propose devolving NDR rate-setting and surcharge powers to local councils to design a system which suit their own needs. Short of that devolution, critical changes to the system are proposed that would raise more revenue from NDRs. This includes (but is not limited to) creating a new band for properties with a rateable value of £1 million and above and ending certain exemptions for big businesses. The party also plans to use the NDR system to add surcharges to businesses which it says cause harm to the environment and communities, including supermarkets and other large retailers selling alcohol and tobacco, gambling, large online businesses and out of town retailers (amongst others). 

      Unlike the Greens, the Conservative’s manifesto is based around cuts to the NDR system. These include guaranteeing that all businesses with a current rateable value of less than £20,000 would pay no business rates with no requirement to apply for business rates relief. Businesses falling just above the threshold would only be taxed on the value of their property above this zero-rated threshold, thus ending the cliff-edge tax rises in the current system.

      Land and Buildings Transaction Tax

      Land and Buildings Transaction Tax (LBTT), the Scottish equivalent to Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT), is often criticised as being bad for the efficiency of the labour and housing markets. Again, most of the parties are proposing changes to the LBTT system, albeit the proposals put forward differ and contain little detail.

      As mentioned above, Reform wants to gradually phase out LBTT and NDRs over 10 years in a revenue neutral way rolling them into an Annual Property Tax. It is unclear how this new tax would co-exist with Council tax.

      In conjunction with the UK Conservative pledge to scrap SDLT on primary residences, the Scottish Conservatives have promised to abolish LBTT on those purchasing a primary residence in Scotland. In addition, the manifesto says it would reduce the Additional Dwelling Supplement (ADS - tax paid on top of LBTT for the purchase of additional homes) from 8 percent to 4 percent.

      Labour has a more limited giveaway on LBTT than the Conservatives, saying it will reduce the amount of tax paid by first time home buyers, by increasing the LBTT relief threshold to £200,000 to save first time buyers up to £1,100 off the cost of buying a home and ensuring 40 percent of first time buyers pay nothing. The costs of this will be partly offset by increasing the rate of LBTT paid by non-UK residents.

      The Green manifesto says it will reform the core LBTT rates and exemptions to raise more revenue. Various other proposals are set out including creating a new ‘Mansion Tax’ rate of 15 percent on properties worth over £1 million, increasing the ADS from 8 percent to 10 percent and introducing a surcharge on the purchase of large land-holdings to force the breakup of more big estates at the point of sale.

      The Liberal Democrats have simply said they would conduct an assessment of how LBTT reform could help free up housing stock and encourage use of difficult brownfield sites. The SNP manifesto meanwhile does not mention LBTT – perhaps unsurprisingly as they have developed the existing system whilst in government.

      There is scepticism from the IFS and the FAI about the financial feasibility of some of the parties' tax pledges, meaning we may not see them translate into policy any time soon. Indeed, the IFS has recently accused all the main parties of a lack of “fiscal realism” and of failing to fully confront the fiscal pressures facing Scotland post-election. Nevertheless, the parties’ tax manifestos give us an important (if incomplete) insight into the possible direction of travel on tax policy when some of Scotland’s difficult fiscal decisions can no longer be put off.

      For further information please contact:

      Our tax insights

      Something went wrong

      Oops!! Something went wrong, please try again