error
Subscriptions are not available for this site while you are logged into your current account.
close
Skip to main content

Loading

The page is loading.

Please wait...


      The case considered the tax treatment of income arising to a UK company (ServiceCo) on the provision of services to a group company with ring fence activities (OilCo). Specifically, the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) considered whether the nature of the services provided were ‘oil extraction activities’ as defined in s272 CTA 2010. Income arising from ‘oil extraction activities’ is subject to the ring fence per s277 and s279 CTA 2010, and as a result subject to higher rates of corporation tax as well as the supplementary charge to corporation tax and the energy profits levy.

      ServiceCo and OilCo had entered into a services agreement in respect of all of the services and works required to undertake OilCo’s production operations. The services were provided at cost plus 15 percent. 

      Broadly, the FTT agreed with HMRC’s position that the fact that the services involved the company’s employees physically extracting oil (even though it was not the beneficial owner of the oil extracted) and that the two companies were associated (s271 CTA 2010) was sufficient to mean that the services company was subject to ring fence taxation. 

      Claire Angell

      Partner, Head of Energy Tax

      KPMG in the UK


      Further debate considered the extent to which the income arising in the services company should be subject to ring fence taxation. The taxpayer considered that, even where the company was found to be undertaking ‘oil extraction activities’, the wider administrative, IT, procurement, engineering and technical support services should not be considered sufficiently directly related such that the income is subject to the higher rates of tax. HMRC’s position, supported by the FTT, was that ‘oil extraction activities’ should be taken to include everything that is required to physically remove the oil and gas from the ground: “if an activity must happen for gas to be extracted, it is part of the extraction process, even if indirectly”. As such, the FTT found that all receipts for the provision of services would be ring fence taxable.

      Taxpayers who have companies in their group providing cross ring fence services charged at a mark up will want to assess their position by reference to their specific facts and circumstances. 


      For further information please contact:

       

      Our tax insights

      Something went wrong

      Oops!! Something went wrong, please try again