Before the 18 May OECD Announcement
Most groups had been anticipating that they would file their GIR in a single jurisdiction, with this jurisdiction’s tax administration then responsible for sharing the GIR with other relevant jurisdictions, i.e. the ‘central filing process’. The information shared with other jurisdictions would be limited to certain relevant parts of the GIR and would satisfy the MNE’s requirement to file a GIR locally that they would otherwise face.
However, to date, many jurisdictions have been slow to sign and activate bilateral exchange relationships based on the OECD’s GIR Multilateral Competent Authority Agreement (MCAA) and some EU member states are yet to implement DAC9, the Directive that provides for central filing within the EU. This would potentially have meant that many more local GIR filings would be needed.
After the 18 May OECD Announcement
33 out of the 38 jurisdictions implementing Pillar Two from 2024 have agreed to waive penalties and forgo enforcement for the absence of a local GIR filing (to the extent permissible under local law), provided that an MNE centrally files their GIR in one of the 33 jurisdictions and files the local GIR notification form.
In theory, this means that MNEs should be able to rely in many instances on the GIR central filing mechanism. Practically, there remain some unanswered questions on whether such relief is permitted under domestic law, and if it is, how it will be provided. The KPMG International overview provides more information and commentary on this.