The EU AI Act[1], emerging global standards, and evolving UK regulatory expectations are increasing the need for organisations to demonstrate responsible oversight of AI.
Governing bodies globally, including regulators and the EU Parliament, are beginning to introduce new regulations and tighten rules around AI systems, alongside the release of standards such as ISO/IEC/42001, which will require organisations to demonstrate that they are creating and operating AI systems responsibly.
When AI is used in important processes, organisations need more than internal confidence. They need a defensible explanation for boards, customers, regulators and procurement teams on how AI is governed, who is accountable, and how risks are controlled.
Third party risk is increasingly central to this. Many organisations rely on AI enabled suppliers, platforms, outsourced services and third-party models, meaning trust depends not only on internal governance, but also on how responsibilities, dependencies, evidence, monitoring and escalation routes are defined across the AI value chain.
For AI enabled services and agentic workflows, the key risks often sit at the application, workflow, human oversight and third-party dependency layers, not only at the model layer.
[1] “EU AI Act” refers to Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament