Effective governance of executive remuneration is critical in a listed entity.
Boardroom pay is one of the most closely scrutinised aspects of post-IPO life. It must be publicly disclosed, which inevitably draws attention not only from investors and regulators, but also the media and public.
Rightly or wrongly, any perception that reward packages are excessive, or unaligned with performance, may trigger negative headlines and shareholder activism. That can bring about reputational damage for the organisation and the individuals concerned.
The right remuneration strategy and structures depend on where the business lists and operates.
In the UK, executive plans tend to be largely performance-based. Indeed, the Investment Association's latest update to its Principles of Remuneration reduces the emphasis on pay restraint. The aim being to promote greater competitiveness, and give UK-listed companies more flexibility.
Hybrid reward strategies are more common in the US, combining elements of pay for performance with recognition of time spent at the company.
Ultimately, your investors need to feel that there's a cogent rationale behind your executive remuneration. Your business and pay strategies must align, so that the board is rewarded for taking the right decisions and actions.
The NEDs on your remuneration committee are responsible for overseeing executive pay. It's complex and detailed work, so give them access to the right data, with the right quality and level of detail, to inform sound judgements.