Luxembourg Tax Alert 2022-05
Luxembourg tax authorities issue DAC6 FAQ
Luxembourg tax authorities issue DAC6 FAQ
The DAC6 guidelines available on the website of the Luxembourg tax authorities before 4 May 2022 mostly focused on practical aspects of DAC6 reporting.
The new FAQ (PDF, 0.7MB) recaps and completes practical definitions which were already available in previous guidelines.
It also provides some useful clarifications on technical aspects of the DAC6 rules, namely on certain hallmarks and the main benefit test.
You will find below a summary of the main interesting points of the FAQ.
Concept of intermediary for in-house arrangements
There is in principle no intermediary when a taxpayer implements an arrangement internally.
However, when a tax team employed by an entity of a multinational group designs (without being involved in) a reportable arrangement for another entity of the same group, the entity employing such tax team should be considered as an intermediary.
Proof that an arrangement has been reported elsewhere in the EU and/or by another intermediary or taxpayer
Such proof shall be provided by any means, upon request by the Luxembourg tax authorities.
Providing the arrangement ID (i.e. the initial reporting reference number) shall, in principle, be considered as sufficient evidence.
Declaration in the annual corporate tax return
Referring to a reportable cross-border arrangement only needs to be done by the relevant taxpayer for years during which such arrangement actually creates a tax advantage.
Arrangement made available for implementation
The FAQ reminds that an arrangement made available for implementation needs to be reported, even in cases where the arrangement is not actually implemented.
Main Benefit Test (“MBT”)
A tax advantage is the main benefit of an arrangement if there are no reasons for the implementation of the latter, other than obtaining a tax advantage or avoiding a tax liability.
Where commercial reasons are invoked, the tax advantage is also considered to be the main benefit of an arrangement if these commercial reasons do not present a sufficient economic benefit beyond the mere tax advantage obtained.
The FAQ also refers to the parliamentary comments of the DAC6 law and states that the MBT should not be met when the tax advantage obtained through the arrangement is consistent with the objective or purpose of the applicable legislation, and in line with the intention of the legislator.
To determine whether the MBT is met, the relevant hallmark must also be taken into account . However, the MBT is not met by the sole fact that the conditions of a given hallmark are met.
Hallmark B.2 – conversion of income
A conversion of income may take place in the hands of the payer or the beneficiary, or both.
The tax advantage resulting from the conversion should be assessed in the hands of the beneficiary of the income only. However, such advantage must consider the taxation of a same entity in several countries (i.e., the tax advantage of the conversion may be anywhere).
Hallmark C.1 – cross-border deductible payment between associated enterprises
Hallmark C.1.a) targets cases where the recipient of the payment is not tax resident anywhere, based on the concept of tax residence defined by the relevant double tax treaty or, in the absence of such treaty, the OECD model tax convention.
When a payment is made to a tax transparent entity, the latter should be regarded as look-through, and the payment should be regarded as made directly to the investors of such entity.
The entity will, however, be considered as the beneficiary of the payment if it is not considered as tax transparent in its jurisdiction of establishment due to application of anti-abuse rules.
Hallmark D.1 - arrangements which may have the effect of undermining reporting obligations under laws or agreements on the automatic exchange of financial account information
Hallmark D.1 should not take into account the intention or absence of intention of the relevant taxpayer to infringe rules on the automatic exchange of information.
Hallmark E.3 – intragroup cross-border transfer reducing the EBIT of the transferor
For the purposes of this hallmark, the EBIT (earnings before interest and taxes) of a company should be understood as its profit of the year (as defined by the standard chart of accounts) plus interest and tax expenses. The profit of the year is the difference between income and expenses as shown in the profit and loss account for the year.
Cross-borders mergers and liquidations should be in scope of hallmark E.3 when they meet the EBIT reduction criteria of such hallmark.
The following situations should in principle not be in the scope of hallmark E.3:
- the administrative transfer of the registered office of a Luxembourg company to another EU Member State, while it maintains a permanent establishment in Luxembourg with the same functions and/or risks and/or assets;
- a tax-free cross-border merger between EU companies where all assets and liabilities remain linked to a permanent establishment of the absorbing company in the tax jurisdiction of the absorbed company.
Subject to further analysis and clarifications, the wide interpretation of some DAC6 concepts and hallmarks by the Luxembourg tax authorities might lead to increased reporting in the coming months and years.
KPMG Luxembourg’s tax professionals are here to assist you regarding any question you may have, as well as help your company to deal with its practical DAC6 obligations (i.e. by providing you with a DAC6 impact assessment, a DAC6 strategy paper or perform your reporting obligations on your behalf).