Skip to main content


      Local Water Done Well is reshaping accountability, lifting expectations, and introducing a level of national scrutiny that many providers have not previously experienced. This is not just about meeting new requirements. It is about establishing a way of working that can stand up to sustained pressure over time.

      New water providers will need to answer questions their predecessors have long deferred: how do we make confident, transparent, long‑term decisions about the assets that underpin essential services? Under new expectations, the way decisions get made matters as much as the decisions themselves.

      At the centre of this shift is Strategic Asset Management (SAM).


      Why this is harder than it sounds

      Many water service providers are stepping into this new environment from a very different starting point.

      Historically, asset management has often been:

      • operational rather than strategic
      • driven by engineering judgement rather than organisation‑wide trade‑offs
      • focused on near‑term renewals rather than long‑term outcomes
      • disconnected from financial planning and customer expectations.

      That approach has worked in a more permissive environment. It becomes harder to sustain when organisations need to clearly explain and justify decisions on cost, risk and performance to regulators, boards, and communities.

      The challenge extends beyond that of capability alone: most organisations have not operated with asset management as an integrated, organisation‑level discipline.


      What Strategic Asset Management really is

      SAM is often described in technical terms or framed through standards. That can make it feel distant from day‑to‑day decision‑making.

      In simple terms, SAM is about how an organisation decides what to invest in, when, and why, so it can deliver reliable services at a cost that communities can afford.

      It connects strategy, finance, operations, and infrastructure. It brings together decisions that are often made in isolation and anchors them in a shared view of outcomes, risk and value.

      Practically, it is what allows an organisation to answer questions such as:

      • How much should we invest in renewals versus growth?
      • What level of service is appropriate for different communities?
      • Where can we defer investment without compromising resilience?
      • How do we demonstrate that choices are deliberate and evidence‑based?

      This becomes especially important as water service providers move towards publishing strategic asset management plans and aligning them with financial and investment planning expectations.


      Why governance is now front and centre

      One of the most important shifts is the growing interest from boards, CEOs and CFOs in asset management.

      Emerging industry insights, including recent insight from Āpōpō, highlight that infrastructure asset management professionals now view governance as among the top priority areas for asset management action. This reflects a broader recognition that asset decisions are not technical matters alone. They are strategic, financial and reputational:

      • Boards are increasingly focused on transparency, risk and long‑term sustainability
      • CEOs are concerned with organisational alignment and delivery confidence
      • CFOs are looking for stronger links between asset plans, investment decisions and affordability.

      SAM provides a common language across these perspectives. It enables clearer trade‑offs, stronger investment narratives, and more consistent oversight.


      Five enablers to activate SAM

      Moving from concept to practice requires attention beyond tools and plans. The organisations that are more likely to make good progress will be focusing on five connected enablers:

      looks_one

      Governance

      Decision‑making structures that connect asset choices to strategy, risk, and financial outcomes.

      looks_two

      Service model

      How services are delivered and at what scale, and how that aligns with its asset management maturity roadmap.

      looks_3

      People

      Building capability and fostering a culture of stewardship and accountability.


      looks_4

      Process

      Embedding risk‑based planning, lifecycle thinking and consistent prioritisation approaches.

      looks_5

      Technology

      Strengthening asset data, systems and digital tools that support evidence‑based decisions.


      Individually each enabler matters, while applied together in a meaningful operating model, they shape whether SAM becomes embedded or remains aspirational.


      What good looks like in practice​

      The difference between low and high maturity is often visible in day‑to‑day behaviours.

      In less mature environments, you might see:​

      • reactive decision‑making driven by immediate issues
      • limited visibility of asset condition and performance
      • investment cases that vary in quality and comparability
      • difficulty explaining trade‑offs to stakeholders.

      In more mature organisations, the picture starts to shift:​

      • investment decisions are clearly linked to outcomes, risk and cost
      • trade‑offs are explicit and consistently applied
      • asset, financial and service planning are aligned
      • Boards and executives have confidence in the underlying evidence.

      These organisations are better positioned to respond to scrutiny, justify investment, and adapt over time. Early adopters are already demonstrating stronger investment justification, improved resilience and greater stakeholder confidence.


      Why this matters now

      The timing is important. Water service providers are preparing to go live in July 2026 have an opportunity to shape how their organisations operate from day one. Choices made now around governance, capability, process and culture will set the tone for years to come.

      For those designing new organisations for 2027, SAM needs to be considered as part of operating model design, and not layered on afterwards.

      And for councils with internal water service units, there is an immediate opportunity to strengthen these foundations within existing structures and build momentum ahead of further change.

      Meaningful plans deliver value when supported by strong discipline that’s delivered along the way, not after the fact.


      A final reflection

      SAM is starting to emerge as the golden thread connecting many of the priorities facing the sector. It sits across governance, investment planning, service delivery and performance transparency.

      More importantly, it is becoming a lever for organisational transformation.

      Those that approach it early and deliberately have an opportunity to move beyond compliance to build something more enduring. It is a way of working that supports better decisions, greater confidence, and stronger trust with the communities they serve, while meeting the increasing expectations of national oversight.


      Contact us

      We are working with clients across the motu to elevate their SAM strategies. We are happy to share our insights for anyone on a similar journey. Get in touch.


      Mair Brooks

      Partner, Infrastructure Advisory – Major Projects and Infrastructure

      KPMG in New Zealand

      Johlene Nel-du Preez

      Director

      KPMG in New Zealand