Skip to main content

      Background

      Polish Ministry of Finance prepared some amendments to the Corporate Income Tax Act following two Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) rulings regarding the conditions under which foreign investment funds can benefit from WHT exemption in Poland: C‑18/23 invalidated the requirement that EU/EEA investment funds be managed by an external ManCo to obtain tax exemption, and C‑190/12 held that automatically excluding comparable third‑country funds from exemption violates EU law. The draft bill, therefore, aimed to clarify the non‑discriminatory, objective conditions under which non‑resident investment funds (from the EU/EEA and third‑countries) can qualify for CIT exemptions while preventing abuse.

      For further details, please access our previous Newsletter



      Recent development

      On 28 November 2025, Poland adopted the amendments, aligning Polish law with the previously mentioned CJEU rulings. The new rules will enter into force on 1 January 2026 and will apply to income received from that date onwards. If a taxpayer's tax year is not the calendar year and the tax year began before 1 January 2026, the existing rules will continue to apply until the end of that tax year.

      The key changes introduced in the final version are the following:

      • Removal of the EU/EEA requirement: removal of the EU/EEA-only requirement, permitting third-country funds to qualify for the exemption.
      • Inclusion of internally managed funds: Expand the ManCo condition to include internally managed funds, provided that either the fund’s activity or its management is authorised by the competent local supervisory authority. The provision should specify that such authorisation – whether for an external ManCo or for internal management – must be granted by the authority explicitly responsible for supervising fund management.
      • Updated residency criteria: The law now recognises both the registered seat and the place of effective management. A fund whose registered seat is in one jurisdiction but is effectively managed in another may qualify for the exemption if it is a tax resident in the jurisdiction where it is effectively managed. This residency requirement applies to the fund itself and not to any external ManCo, and the amendment is not intended to allow choosing the fund’s residency based on the ManCo’s residence. The legislative explanatory notes state that a fund cannot satisfy the residency test by relying on the ManCo’s certificate of tax residence. However, that note only reflects the drafter’s intention and does not have binding legal force, so the provision’s final interpretation could differ.
      • New condition for investment fund exemption – automatic exchange of information: The amendment adds a further condition: the fund’s home jurisdiction must participate in automatic exchange of tax information with Poland (under CRS, including DAC2, or under FATCA), and Polish authorities must be able to obtain information on the fund’s investors and accounts. Consequently, funds based in jurisdictions lacking effective automatic information‑exchange mechanisms may be ineligible. The Ministry of Finance publishes and regularly updates a list of jurisdictions that satisfy this requirement.
      • Anti-abuse provisions: The object‑based exemption for investment funds (i.e., those not structured as UCITS) is now subject to an anti‑abuse mechanism, permitting denial of the exemption where the fund’s structure or transactions are artificial. 


      KPMG comment

      We expect that the EU Commission’s position will improve access to dividend exemption benefits for non‑resident public entities and may give rise to refund claims.

      Given the one‑year limitation period, we recommend promptly filing reclaims with the Luxembourg tax authorities.

      KPMG Luxembourg has been filing withholding tax reclaims for non-Luxembourg public entities with the Luxembourg tax authorities for over 10 years, and our team of tax specialists can assist you with the process.

      We will continue to monitor developments and provide updates as further information becomes available.



      Our experts

      Olivier Schneider

      Partner, Funds Services Taxation

      KPMG in Luxembourg

      Daniel Rech

      Partner, Banking Market Leader

      KPMG in Luxembourg

      Related content

      Stay ahead of changes in Luxembourg tax and international fund regulations with insights from our experts.

      Make better decisions with our expert analysis of local and global trends, challenges and opportunities.