The first law to have regulated the PPP sector in Kuwait was the BOT Law No. 7 of 2008 on BOT projects.
This law was subsequently replaced by the IWPP Law No. 39 of 2010 (which remains in effect and was issued to regulate large-scale PPP schemes in the water and electricity sector), and the PPP Law No. 116 of 2014, which established the Kuwait Authority for Partnership Projects (KAPP) as a successor to the Partnerships Technical Bureau established under Law No. 7 of 2008.
Both the IWPP Law and the PPP Law were passed because the government realized that Law No. 7 of 2008 did not fully meet international standards and practices.
In addition to the IWPP and PPP Laws, a specialized law on privatization was issued in 2010, which is the Law No. 37 of 2010 Regulating Privatization Programs and Transactions. While this law remains in effect, to our knowledge, there is only one example of its implementation, which is the privatization of North Shuaiba power and water plant. No other examples exist of privatization programs that have been successfully completed in Kuwait.
Separately, another specialized authority which is playing a major role in smaller scale PPP projects, is the Public Authority for Housing Welfare established under Law No. 47 of 1993 (PAHW). PAHW, in combination with the PPP Law (and its own Investment Resolution) launched a number of mixed use real estate development investment opportunities structured as PPPs.
In addition to the specialized laws previously noted, we should mention Law No. (49) of 2016 which regulates public tenders in Kuwait.
From a contractual standpoint, we note that only two PPP projects have taken place thus far in Kuwait, i.e., Az Zour North 1 IWPP and Umm Al Hayman wastewater treatment plant.
At present, there are couple of projects in the pipeline. KAPP recently issued the RFP for Az-Zour North Phases 2 and 3.
In addition, KAPP released the results of prequalification phase for Al Dibdibah Power and Al Shagaya Renewable Energy – Phase III–Zone 1 Solar PV IPP project, and the fixed telecommunications network development project, respectively.
In our view, these projects will generally rely on standardized documents and agreements, which should minimally differ from one another depending on the nature of the project being contemplated.