Skip to main content

      With the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), sustainability reporting has finally become a reality for businesses. Following intense political debate and the EU’s omnibus procedure, the regulatory framework has once again undergone significant changes: Thresholds have been raised, deadlines postponed and reporting requirements simplified.

      At the same time, the so-called second wave of CSRD reporting is drawing nearer for a newly defined group of companies. For these companies, a key question now arises: 

      • What will really matter in the future, and how can sustainability be implemented in a pragmatic, exam-oriented way that adds value?

      Who is affected by the second wave of the CSRD, what has changed – and what are the consequences?

      Following the amendments to the CSRD under the Omnibus I procedure, significantly fewer companies will be subject to direct reporting requirements in future. Under the CSRD amending directive of 26 February 2026, the so-called ‘second wave’ will include very large companies, including those not listed on capital markets, which

      • employ more than 1,000 staff on average over the year and
      • generate net turnover in excess of €450 million.

      For these companies, mandatory CSRD reporting will commence for the first time for the 2027 financial year (report to be published in 2028).

      auto_stories

      The publication outlines current ESG requirements and highlights their specific implications for small and medium-sized enterprises. 

      ESRS standards are being simplified: here are the details

      In addition to the legal framework, the applicable reporting standards (European Sustainability Reporting Standards, ESRS) are also being simplified: fewer data points and a methodologically simpler two-step materiality analysis are emerging as the most significant changes. What has not changed, however, is:

      • Sustainability information continues to form part of the management report.
      • The analysis of impacts, risks and opportunities (IROs) remains the cornerstone of the content.
      • Data must be complete, traceable and audit-proof (even though the level of audit scrutiny will remain limited).

      The number of companies required to report has decreased. However, the requirements for those that do have to report remain demanding and call for a well-thought-out approach, clear priorities and robust processes.

      For large medium-sized and family-run businesses in particular, efficient processes and a sense of proportion are essential to ensure that ESG reporting does not remain an end in itself, but becomes a solid foundation for resilience, efficiency and value creation. Successful companies rely on:

      • A focus on what matters most rather than data collection at any cost,
      • integrated ESG data management that links reporting, bank and counterparty ratings, and other regulatory requirements,
      • standardised, repeatable processes that are also audit-proof, and
      • technology- and AI-driven solutions to reduce effort and improve quality.

      How we can help you

      Don’t view the CSRD as a mere compliance requirement, but as an opportunity: implemented efficiently, approached strategically and delivering genuine added value for your business.

      Our experts support you across all levels of ESG reporting to make the transition to the new sustainability reporting as smooth and beneficial as possible. 

      Our modular project approaches are tailored entirely to your individual needs – practical, flexible and technology-driven. So that you get exactly the support that really helps you move forward. 

      More KPMG Insights

      Your contacts