Netherlands: Referral to CJEU of issue relating to taxation of dividend income received by non-resident

An issue of whether CJEU’s judgment applies to all cases when a non-resident receives dividend income from another member state

Referral to CJEU of issue relating to taxation of dividend income

The Court of Appeals in ‘s-Hertogenbosch today issued an opinion referring to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) the issue of whether the CJEU’s judgment in the Société Générale case (C-17/14, 17 September 2015) applies to all cases when a non-resident receives dividend income from another member state.

Summary

The taxpayer is a UK-based life insurance company that received dividend income from the Netherlands subject to 15% Dutch withholding tax. The taxpayer sought to deduct costs directly related to such dividend income (i.e., costs attributable to the increase in the company's future payment obligations) in determining the amount of its income subject to Dutch tax.

In the Société Générale case, a French bank received dividend income from the Netherlands subject to 15% Dutch withholding tax, and the CJEU held that the bank was only entitled to a deduction of the costs relating to the collection of the dividends, and not to the directly related expenses.

The Dutch tax authorities have used the CJEU’s judgment in the Société Générale case as a guiding precedent for all cases concerning non-residents that receive dividend income from the Netherlands. A similar approach has also been taken by tax authorities in many other member states.

The taxpayer argued before the Dutch Court of Appeals that although the CJEU’s judgment in the Société Générale case is not necessarily wrong, the facts in Société Générale are fundamentally different from its facts because the dividend income was critical to its business model and the services it offered its clients. In light of this difference, the Société Générale case is not the leading case for resolving the dispute, and other CJEU net taxation judgments providing for a deduction of the directly related expenses must be used as guidance here.

Read a December 2022 report prepared by the KPMG member firm in the Netherlands

 

The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organization. KPMG International Limited is a private English company limited by guarantee and does not provide services to clients. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. The information contained herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 3712, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.