Australia: Proposed amendments to thin capitalisation rules
Expectations that proposed changes to safe harbour debt test would result in more REITs having to rely on arm’s length debt test
During the recent election campaign, the Australian Labor Party announced it will replace the existing thin capitalization safe harbor debt test (60% of assets) with the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development’s (OECD's) recommended approach under BEPS Action 4 (Limiting base erosion involving interest deductions and other financial payments).
This proposal would limit deductions for net interest expenses to 30% of “earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization” (EBITDA). The alternative worldwide-gearing ratio and arm’s length debt test would be retained.
Possible implications for REITs
Tax professionals expect that the proposed changes to the safe harbour debt test would result in a significantly higher proportion of real estate investment trusts (REITs) needing to rely on the arm’s length debt test. In turn, this could lead to an increase in compliance costs so as to satisfy the new thin capitalisation provisions.
In this regard, the arm’s length debt test requires consideration of what an entity “would borrow” as well as the amount that a lender would lend, and as such, the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) expects a significant amount of market/benchmarking analysis to be undertaken to support a position. This expectation—along with what can often be a lack of publicly available market data that is admissible for tax purposes—could require relatively higher compliance resources to support a debt amount beyond the safe harbour limit.
Read a June 2022 report [PDF 332 KB] prepared by the KPMG member firm in Australia
The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organization. KPMG International Limited is a private English company limited by guarantee and does not provide services to clients. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. The information contained herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 3712, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.