The European Union (EU) has been lagging in global competitiveness and innovation. Recent geopolitical tensions, leading to a de facto trade war, add challenges to an economy battling a prolonged energy crisis, struggling to secure critical raw materials and attracting the right talents. An action plan was desperately needed, not just for immediate economic stability, but rather for reigniting long-term competitiveness and resilience.
The need for such a plan is not new. In 2019, the EU published its flagship ‘European Green Deal’ – setting out an ambitious strategy to “transform the EU into a modern, resource-efficient and competitive economy”. To implement the Green Deal, the EU mainly followed the course of compliance while providing finance through various funds and incentive schemes. Pivotal legislative initiatives like the ‘European Climate Law’, ‘Fit for 55’, the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), and the groundbreaking CSRD, are a few key examples on how the EU aimed at driving innovations to achieve at least a 55% greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction by 2030, and climate-neutrality by 2050.
The current state of the EU economy is a testament to the failure of the approach taken. A complex regulatory regime, fragmented markets and decreasing labor productivity have been criticized as inhibitors of innovation, investment and growth. A falling market share in digital tech and relocation of more than 25% (40 out of 147) of EU-founded ‘unicorns’ are a few illustrations of this stagnation. In our previous article, Impact of EU Compass on your ESG Strategy, we discussed these challenges and predicted a competitiveness-oriented future for European industrial policy.
On 26 February 2025, the European Commission published the (sustainability) ‘Omnibus Package’ and the ‘Clean Industrial Deal’ with an aim to address these challenges to competitiveness, economic resilience and the inevitable climate crisis. While the Omnibus Package proposes to streamline sustainability reporting, due diligence and eliminate compliance costs, the Clean Industrial Deal is meant to bring together “climate action and competitiveness under one overarching growth strategy”, to uphold the climate-neutrality ambitions of the European Green Deal.
This has created some confusion, and our clients have been reaching out to understand the key business implications of this landmark policy package. Does the Clean Industrial Deal change the ESG discourse and ambitions in the EU? What are the key opportunities for businesses while the EU is transitioning towards a decarbonized and resilient economy?
At KPMG, we welcome the Clean Industrial Deal (CID) proposal. We believe that the CID paves the way to a strategic transition, which focuses on key ESG topics and brings considerable energy and resource security advantages to businesses, essential in the current geopolitical times. As the Sustainability Omnibus Package proposes reduced compliance costs and burdens for corporate actors, this provides an opportunity for value-chain-wide investments and innovation.
The Context: The ‘Clean Industrial Deal’ as a re-focused enabler of the ‘European Green Deal’
Can the CID keep Europe on track of its climate ambitions, by providing an actionable roadmap to mobilize investments and efforts?
There are some concerns over the weakening of the Green Deal as the Omnibus Package proposes sweeping amendments to its reporting and compliance cornerstones (CSRD, CSDDD, EU Taxonomy, CBAM), for example exempting up to 80% of previously in-scope companies from sustainability reporting obligations.
In our view, the CID does not undermine but rather re-focuses the Green Deal. While ambiguity remains in the detailed implementation of the proposal, we see clear priorities emerging which will be instrumental in steering the EU industrial transition, and offering opportunities for early movers. Three major measures where the CID aims to consolidate and strengthen key Green Deal mechanisms, easing the rollout of existing policies and offering competitive market advantages to already transforming businesses:
- The CID reasserts the EU’s ambition for a net-zero economy by 2050 and mentions an intermediate 2040 target of a 90% greenhouse gas emissions reduction (first presented in early 2024). Although there is a delay in a legislative proposal for the same, a 2040 target is crucial in guiding the post-2030 transformation pace of the economy.
- The Industrial Decarbonisation Accelerator Act proposes to: a) address permitting bottlenecks for clean energy supply, b) stimulate demand through voluntary carbon intensity labels, and c) integrate non-price criteria for sustainability and resilience into procurement methodologies; all with the aim to give competitive advantage to EU-made clean products and first movers. These measures build upon and strengthen Green Deal initiatives like the Renewable Energy Directive, the Critical Raw Materials Act and the Net-Zero Industry Act (NZIA), which have faced implementation barriers due to high energy prices, complex permitting procedures for clean energy deployment and investment gaps (particularly in relation to grid infrastructure).
- The CID proposes a number of specific actions to help finance the clean transition, including establishing the Industrial Decarbonisation Bank to leverage existing vehicles such as InvestEU, the Innovation Fund and the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS), to deploy EUR 100 billion from public and private sources over the next ten (10) years into building a clean industrial sector. The bank intends to streamline the bureaucratic barriers to funding, ensure competitiveness and fairness in allocation of capital across Member States and take a technology-neutral approach to closing the finance gap in the EU.
The Opportunities: Energy and resource security through decarbonization and circularity, with skills and investment
The CID positions decarbonization and circularity as fundamentals for clean and resilient value chains: two opportunities that in our view are essential in driving the corporate strategic ESG agenda forward, highlighting an often overlooked benefit of ESG: security.
To achieve such security, the CID proposes key drivers, with a focus on the energy-intensive industries and clean tech sector – which are considered the current and future spines of the European economy. We outline these six drivers and the opportunities companies could unlock:
Drivers | Opportunities | |
1. Affordable energy for industrial competitiveness |
|
|
2. Boosting supply and demand for clean products |
|
|
3. Financing the clean transition |
|
|
4. Circularity for raw-material and resource resilience |
|
|
5. International partnerships for sustainable value chains |
|
|
6. Just transition through quality jobs and upskilling |
|
|
The Challenges: Existing finance gap and ambiguity in implementation emerge as key concerns
Although the Clean Industrial Deal sets the right priorities, we also identified areas which require strengthening and attention for an effective implementation:
- The CID does not provide detailed actions for ensuring strong environmental and social conditionalities of public investment. The proposal acknowledges the importance of a fossil fuel phase-out and tax measures to make a stronger business case for electrification, but concrete measures to implement the ‘polluter pays’ principle are ambiguous.
- The CID is silent on key environmental topics like chemical pollution, biodiversity loss and human rights, which are essential for health and wellbeing of society. Ambitions to create a nature-sensitive, zero-pollution and toxin-free industry are not iterated in the CID.
- The easing of EU’s key corporate sustainability frameworks (CSRD, CSDDD, EU Taxonomy) could create financing barriers, especially for small and medium enterprises (SMEs), due to a lack of data, which is required by investors to make decisions, manage risks, identify opportunities and channel capital towards a clean economy.
- A conclusive legislative proposal for an intermediate 2040 climate target is much awaited, and until then actionable long-term measures will remain under threat. This target is key for beginning an effective policy dialogue for the post-2030 sustainability agenda, which is less than 1,000 working days from today.
We consider it critical for the European Commission to address the above points when releasing the individual policy actions announced in the package.
The Verdict: The Corporate Sector has an essential role in propelling the Clean Industrial Deal
We want to conclude this article by emphasizing the importance of the corporate sector in propelling the Clean Industrial Deal. Companies can create markets of scale through collaboration, unlocking investments, influencing consumer demands and maximizing the contribution of skilled communities in the transition. This is critical to nurturing a clean economy and enhancing security from geopolitical disturbances and international trade uncertainties.
In addition to the actions as outlined in this article, we recommend three general actions for corporates to align with the CID objectives and position themselves as leaders at the onset of the transition:
- Improve future resilience by working on three interconnected ESG transformations: your business portfolio, your operations and your reporting process.
- Strategize your ESG agenda and efforts by differentiating between ‘hygiene topics’ and value creation topics.
- Invest in decarbonization and circularity levers as measures beyond purely operational transformation, and rather towards business competitiveness and security.
Do you want to stay up to date with the latest developments and insights on the Clean Industrial Deal, please register for our ESG Today newsletter below.