Skip to main content
Contact
Submit RFP

      Tech transactions are complex – not because of the individual analyses, but because of how they interact. For tech companies, key value drivers such as revenue quality, scalability, profitability, and technological substance are closely interlinked. In practice, however, these dimensions are often viewed in isolation – with differing assumptions, varying KPI definitions, and limited transparency as to their impact on valuation and transaction structure.

      The result is often not a coherent overall picture but a fragmented and sometimes contradictory one – precisely where clarity matters the most for sound decision-making.

      Collaboration instead of Silos: An Integrated Deal View

      Our experts from Deal Advisory, Accounting, Technology, Tax, and Law work in close collaboration. Financial analyses, accounting implications, and IT-related assessments are not treated in isolation but are consolidated into an integrated assessment.

      This creates “One Integrated View” that:

      • clarifies key value drivers,
      • derives consistent valuations, and
      • supports decisions across all teams.

      Which Perspectives Must be Integrated in Tech Transactions?

      We view the financial, operational, and technological dimensions within their economic context and not in isolation. In doing so, we specifically combine key analytical perspectives:

      • Financial metrics and their balance sheet drivers
      • Operational KPIs and the underlying business models and growth drivers
      • Technological scalability and its impact on valuation and growth potential
      • Transaction risks and realizable value-enhancement potential

      Close coordination among different functional areas is crucial to achieving this comprehensive view in tech transactions. Our teams work in a cross-functional structure that brings together financial, technological, accounting, and legal expertise within a shared framework.

      On this basis, a consistent line of reasoning is developed for valuation, risks, and value potential – from analysis through to implementation.

      Tech Deal Advisory Throughout the Entire Transaction Process

      finance

      Sell‑Side – Consistently Presenting Value

      Our experts help prepare structured financial, KPI, and technology information to consistently present valuation assumptions and the equity story.

      sim_card_alert

      Buy‑Side – Consistently Assessing Risks and Valuation

      Analysis of financial, operational, and technological risks and their impact on purchase price, structure, and deal logic.

      show_chart

      Growth and Financing – Underpinning Investment Decisions

      At Tech Deal Advisory, our teams develop a consistent view of scalability, profitability, and future value potential as the foundation for investor decisions.

      Added Value for Our Clients

      • Clarity on key value drivers
      • Consistent and robust valuation logic
      • Alignment across all functions involved
      • Informed and swift decision-making
      Contact us.

      Complex Tech Transactions.
      Successfully Executed

      local_offer

      Deal Advisory

      Software AG

      Support with vendor assistance, including SPA advisory services, in connection with the sale of the integration business.

      local_offer

      Deal Advisory

      SAP

      Support with buy-side financial and tax due diligence, the preparation of a fairness opinion and SPA advisory services in connection with the acquisition of Dremio.

      local_offer

      Deal Advisory

      SAP

      Buy-side support in connection with the acquisition of SmartRecruiters.

      local_offer

      Deal Advisory

      Carlyle

      Buy-side support in connection with the acquisition of GBTEC.

      Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

      ARR (annual recurring revenue) and NRR (net recurring revenue) are only reliable if it is clear how they are defined and derived from financial reporting. In practice, differing definitions and assumptions deliver metrics that look similar but have different economic implications. It is essential to contextualize these differences transparently within the overall valuation.

      Financial figures and KPIs often feature different underlying logic: KPIs track operational performance, while financial statements follow accounting rules. These differences mean that figures can be “correct” while simultaneously conveying different messages—it is crucial to align the underlying logic (e.g., accruals or revenue recognition) so that all teams interpret the figures in the same way.

      Revenue quality, growth, and profitability are frequently analyzed separately, leading to different interpretations of the same figures. This makes it more difficult to justify multiples and valuation assumptions transparently and consistently.

      Insights from the integrated analysis are incorporated into purchase price mechanisms, earn-out structures, and contract clauses. It is important that economic drivers are consistently translated into the contract logic — otherwise, room for interpretation and implementation risks arise.

      An integrated approach is leveraged to link financial analysis, accounting, and technology within a common framework. This creates a unified overall picture (“One Integrated View”) that all of the teams involved can use to make sound and coordinated decisions.

      Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly becoming part of tech companies’ investment and growth logic — with implications for value creation, scalability, risk assessment, and competitive positioning. In tech due diligence, it is crucial to determine whether AI applications are actually being used productively, are scalable, and have a measurable impact on revenue, costs, or competitive positioning — or whether they remain primarily part of the equity story. A structured analysis of AI capabilities helps classify maturity levels, use cases, and risks systematically, and derive their significance for valuation, growth potential, and transaction decisions.

      The results serve as the basis for value creation measures and post-merger integration. They help translate value drivers from the transaction into concrete actions and actively manage risks.

      Your contacts