What’s the issue?
Currently, there is diversity in practice when accounting for deferred tax on transactions that involve recognizing both an asset and a liability with a single tax treatment related to both.
For example, a company may be entitled to a tax deduction on a cash basis for a lease transaction that involves recognizing a right-of-use (ROU) asset and a corresponding lease liability under IFRS 16 Leases2 . A temporary difference may then arise on initial recognition of the ROU asset and the lease liability. When applying the IRE to this temporary difference, a company may currently apply one of the following approaches.
| Approach | Outcome |
| Apply the IRE separately to the ROU asset and lease liability | Recognize the tax impacts in profit or loss when they are incurred and therefore recognize no deferred tax on the lease |
Assess the ROU asset and lease liability together as a single or ‘integrally linked’ transaction on a net basis | Recognize deferred tax on a net temporary difference that arises after the initial recognition and is not subject to the IRE |
Choose not to apply the IRE | Recognize deferred tax |
In short, not all companies reflect the future tax impacts of leases in their financial statements.
Recognition exemption narrowed
The amendments clarify that the exemption does not apply to transactions such as leases and decommissioning obligations. These transactions give rise to equal and offsetting temporary differences and this example (PDF 88 KB) illustrates how a company applies the amendments.
All companies will now need to reflect the future tax impacts of these transactions and recognize deferred tax, as illustrated below.