What are the proposals for the own use exemption?
It is not always clear under IFRS 9 whether a company that purchases PPAs can apply the own use exemption for accounting purposes. If the own use exemption does not apply, PPAs are accounted for as derivatives measured at fair value through profit or loss (FVTPL). PPAs are often long-term agreements, so measuring them at FVTPL can potentially create significant volatility in the income statement over many reporting periods.
To apply the own use exemption to a PPA, IFRS 9 currently requires companies to assess whether the contract is for receipt of electricity in line with the company’s expected purchase or usage requirements – e.g. the purchaser expects to use the quantity it buys, and then actually uses it.
The challenge arises due to the unique characteristics of electricity (including the difficulty to store it) and its market structure – i.e. if a purchasing company is not able to use the electricity within a short period, the electricity has to be sold back to the market. Although these sales occur because of the market structure, and not to profit from short-term price fluctuations, it is unclear if the company can apply the own use exemption under existing requirements.
The proposed amendments would allow a company to apply the own use exemption to certain PPAs depending on:
- their purpose, design, and structure;
- the reasons for past and expected sales of unused electricity; and
- whether such sales are consistent with the company’s expected purchases or usage requirements.
The proposals would require companies to apply the proposed amendments retrospectively (without requiring prior periods to be restated).
What are the proposals for hedge accounting?
Virtual PPAs2 and PPAs that do not meet the own use exemption are accounted for as derivatives and measured at FVTPL. Applying hedge accounting could help companies to reduce profit or loss volatility by reflecting how these PPAs hedge the price of future electricity purchases or sales.
Under IFRS 9, to apply hedge accounting there needs to be an economic offset between changes in the value of hedging instruments and hedged transactions.
Buyers and sellers of PPAs face challenges when applying cash flow hedge accounting under IFRS 9. This is because the fair value of the hedging instrument (PPA) is based on a P50 estimate3, while the hedged transaction is required to be based on a P90 estimate4 due to the requirement for a hedged transaction to be highly probable. This creates a mismatch which could lead to the hedging relationship not qualifying for hedge accounting.