error
Subscriptions are not available for this site while you are logged into your current account.
close
Skip to main content

      In this article David Reaney and Emma Robinson explore HMRC’s change in policy regarding VAT deductibility on the management of pension funds, as outlined in Revenue and Customs Brief 4(2025). Detailed guidance is expected in the Autumn, but businesses should review their position now and consider whether a protective claim should be submitted.


      Overview

      In a significant and helpful move to clarify the VAT treatment of costs related to the management of pension funds, just before the summer HMRC introduced Revenue and Customs Brief 4 (2025). Effective from 18 June 2025, this Brief outlines the new approach and provides guidance on how employers can recover VAT on investment management costs.

      This article highlights the key aspects of the Brief and its implications for employers and pension schemes.

      The Brief aims to provide a clear framework for recovering VAT on investment management costs, ensuring that employers and trustees can navigate the process with greater certainty. However, the Brief ends with HMRC stating that it “will publish guidance to explain the policy change by autumn 2025”.

      Therefore, whilst some of the clarity is yet to come, this change is significant and may present an opportunity for employers to revisit the past treatment of relevant costs and potentially make a claim to recover additional input tax retrospectively, within the normal 4 year cap. 

      David Reaney

      Partner, Indirect Tax – VAT & Customs

      KPMG in Ireland


      Emma Robinson

      Associate Director

      KPMG in Ireland


      HMRC’s previous policy

      HMRC’s previous policy allowed employers with occupational pension schemes to claim part of the VAT on investment costs where there was dual use by an employer and the trustees.

      HMRC required a fair and reasonable apportionment to be made to determine each party’s input tax deduction. This typically led to the employer only being able to recover part of the VAT being incurred as some was attributable to the trustees.  

      As a result of the CJEU decision in Fiscale Eenheid PPG Holdings BV cs te Hoogezand (C-26/12) HMRC allowed employers to recover input VAT on investment costs if they could evidence that they had contracted for and paid for the investment services.

      This led to changes being introduced by many employers including the trustees providing services to the employer and VAT grouping. HMRC’s view of these arrangements was that a dual use of the costs occurred.


      HMRC’s new policy

      HMRC has now changed its view on investment costs and no longer considers them to be subject to dual use between the employer and the trustees. Instead, the Brief states that all input tax incurred on investment costs is to be seen as the employer’s and deductible by the employer, subject to the normal rules of input tax deduction.

      HMRC’s landing page for the Brief states, ‘Employers can now claim back all the VAT on investment costs linked to pension funds. They no longer need to split the costs with pension trustees. If trustees are providing pension fund management services and charging the employer, they can also claim back VAT on their costs, as long as they’re VAT-registered. Both must still follow the usual VAT rules.’


      Key points to consider

      • Retrospective claims

        One of the most notable aspects of the brief is the reference to claims for additional input VAT. This highlights the possibility of making a claim to adjust the past treatment of investment management costs. HMRC’s reference to claims makes clear that they will be subject to the normal 4-year cap.

        The interaction of this cap with the guidance awaited in Autumn 2025 means employers should consider making a claim now without awaiting the guidance, i.e. a protective claim. 

      • Deduction ‘Subject to normal deduction rules’

        A strict reading of this phrase would suggest that recovery by the employer could only take place, for example, if it has received a VAT invoice in its name for the services.

        Practically speaking this would be very difficult to achieve as historically such an invoice is likely to be addressed to the trustees. While HMRC’s guidance is yet to be released, we understand that HMRC plan to apply a more generous interpretation of this phrase.

        Specifically, this might include (i) not requiring the employer to be a party to the investment management contract (which will generally not be the case), (ii) some flexibility on invoicing, e.g. use of ‘care of’ invoices, and (iii) in terms of payment, the cost being indirectly born by the employer (via scheme contributions) might be enough.


        Until the guidance is published we will not know HMRC’s position on these points but we mention them to highlight that a retrospective claim should be considered even where the fact pattern, e.g. for invoicing, may not be ideal.

      • Reviewing your structure

        Depending on your specific circumstances, to achieve the optimal VAT position going forward you may need to consider making some changes, this might include:
         

        1. The contracting and invoicing position for each investment manager;
        2. VAT grouping the employer and pension fund;
        3. Introducing supplies of services from the trustees to the employer; and
        4. Revisiting a PESM which has been drafted in line with the previous policy position.

      Conclusion

      Revenue and Customs Brief 4 (2025) represents a significant step forward in clarifying the VAT treatment of pension scheme costs, which has been an evolving area over the last 10-15 years and it should simplify the approach to input tax recovery for employers.  While the policy change is welcome, the detail of HMRC’s position is still awaited, in particular around the interpretation of the phrase ‘subject to the normal deduction rules’. As a result, some uncertainty remains.

      Businesses should revisit the approach they have taken to VAT recovery on investment costs over the last four years to

      1. consider whether there is an opportunity to submit a protective claim for previously under recovered input tax, including claims which rely on a generous interpretation of the phrase ‘subject to normal deduction rules’, and 
      2. assess whether the current structure is the optimum structure based on the new policy position. 

      This article originally appeared in TaxPoint, Chartered Accountants Ireland (September 2025) and is reproduced here with their kind permission.


      Get in touch

      If you have any queries on the treatment of VAT in pension schemes, please contact our Indirect Tax team for an initial conversation. We'd be delighted to hear from you.

      David Reaney

      Partner, Indirect Tax – VAT & Customs

      KPMG in Ireland

      Emma Robinson

      Associate Director

      KPMG in Ireland


      Read more in this series

        No content available

        No results match your current settings

        Server error

        A server error prevented us from completing your search. Please try again later.